From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Blizzards Subject: Re: NAT IP POOL! Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 12:59:32 +0100 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <3DEF3FA4.1010404@libero.it> References: <3DEF3465.4070003@libero.it> <1039088743.489.31.camel@xbox> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Filip Sneppe Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org > > >Hi, > >You probably want to look at the NETMAP target that is in patch-o-matic. >SNAT and DNAT targets will do some loadbalancing. You'll get weird >results with your setup. > >With NETMAP you can do source NAT and destination NAT of whole subnets >with a strict 1:1 mapping. > Ok, but if i need to SNAT a whole subnet 192.168.1.0/24 with a short pool of address like 172.16.1.1-172.16.1.10 with a strict 1:1 only 10 ip are natted. NETMAP give me the ability to write down a PAT address for the rest of connections? Or for short pool it's better to setup interfaces aliases? Thanks. Giulius. > >Regards, >Filip > > > >