From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3E080647.8060407@intracom.gr> Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 09:01:27 +0200 From: Pantelis Antoniou MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Rini Cc: Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org, Dan Malek Subject: Re: New style dpalloc/hostalloc routines (diff). References: <3E006C94.2090503@intracom.gr> <15874.23846.177956.192840@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <3E02E984.8090904@intracom.gr> <20021223164928.GF15397@opus.bloom.county> In-Reply-To: <20021223164928.GF15397@opus.bloom.county> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Tom Rini wrote: >On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 11:57:24AM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > >>Here is the updated patch in diff format as per your suggestions. > >Looks good. My only real issue is that this is a big change, so I would >rather see either (or both) of the following happen: >Make a patch vs 2.5. This will require additional 8xx work to get >things going again. >Please hold on this until all of the otherwise stable 8xx work can get >out of the linuxppc_2_4_devel tree and into linuxppc_2_4 / Marcelo. > >Also, Dan Malek, any comments on all of this? Well, I'll try but I haven't messed with 2.5 yet. Does it even work at all for 8xx? Has anybody in the list worked with it? I would very much like the two trees getting merged finally, as I'm forced to maintaining my own tree, forked off Marcelo. Regards, and Merry Christmas to all Pantelis ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/