All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
To: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
Cc: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented?
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 15:22:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E296342.B3042E09@linux-m68k.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030118052919.GA22751@work.bitmover.com

Hi,

Larry McVoy wrote:

> I guess I don't know how to help you.  As far as I can tell, if Linus
> wasn't using BK he'd still be doing what he was doing up until he started
> using BK which means you wouldn't have the option of the up to date
> snapshots you can currently get.

IOW "You should be thankful for what I offer, if you don't like it, piss
off!"
Might not be what you've intended, but that's what I arrived here and
I'm sure I'm not the only one.

bye, Roman


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-01-18 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-18  4:33 Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? Jamie Lokier
2003-01-18  4:57 ` David Schwartz
2003-01-18  5:10   ` Jamie Lokier
2003-01-18  7:23     ` David Schwartz
2003-01-18  7:54       ` [OFFTOPIC] Is the repository of a GPL'd program itself under the GPL? Jamie Lokier
2003-01-20  0:50         ` Richard Stallman
2003-01-18  5:02 ` Is the BitKeeper network protocol documented? Andrew Morton
2003-01-18  5:15   ` Jamie Lokier
2003-01-18  5:29 ` Larry McVoy
2003-01-18  6:11   ` Tupshin Harper
2003-01-18  6:20   ` Kevin Puetz
2003-01-18  6:39     ` Larry McVoy
2003-01-18  8:09   ` Jamie Lokier
2003-01-18  8:25     ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-18 14:22   ` Roman Zippel [this message]
2003-01-19 18:39     ` Andreas Dilger
2003-01-19 18:55       ` Jamie Lokier
2003-01-19 21:50       ` Roman Zippel
2003-01-19 23:26         ` Andreas Dilger
2003-01-19 23:57           ` David Schwartz
2003-01-20  0:20             ` Andreas Dilger
2003-01-20  0:38               ` David Schwartz
2003-01-20 15:52             ` Horst von Brand
2003-01-20 19:43               ` David Schwartz
2003-01-20 19:46               ` David Schwartz
2003-01-21  7:56                 ` Horst von Brand
2003-01-20 14:18           ` Roman Zippel
2003-01-22 12:24   ` Matthias Andree
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-18  6:22 Jamie Lokier
     [not found] <20030119235742.AAA13049%shell.webmaster.com@whenever>
2003-01-20  0:36 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-01-20  1:05   ` David Schwartz
2003-01-20 14:28     ` Dana Lacoste
2003-01-20 19:00       ` David Schwartz
2003-01-20 19:31         ` David Lang
2003-01-20 20:19           ` David Schwartz
2003-01-20 20:40             ` John Bradford
2003-01-20 20:48             ` Andreas Dilger
2003-01-20 21:14               ` David Schwartz
2003-01-20 21:58                 ` John Bradford
2003-01-20 21:37               ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-01-20 21:41             ` Rik van Riel
2003-01-21 16:04         ` Dana Lacoste
2003-01-21 18:34           ` David Schwartz
2003-01-21 18:49             ` John Bradford
2003-01-21 18:58             ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-01-21 19:27             ` Dana Lacoste
2003-01-21 21:04               ` David Schwartz
2003-01-21 19:51             ` Hua Zhong
2003-01-22  7:10               ` Jamie Lokier
2003-01-22  7:21                 ` John Alvord
2003-01-22 15:18                 ` Larry McVoy
2003-01-22 15:27                   ` Dana Lacoste
2003-01-22 15:38                     ` Larry McVoy
2003-01-20  1:46   ` David Lang
2003-01-20  1:52   ` Andre Hedrick
     [not found] <20030120010504.AAA18836%shell.webmaster.com@whenever>
2003-01-20  1:37 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-01-20 15:55 Theodore Ts'o
2003-01-20 18:53 ` David Schwartz
     [not found] <20030120194430.AAA20700%shell.webmaster.com@whenever>
2003-01-20 20:32 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-01-20 21:27   ` David Schwartz
2003-01-21  8:51     ` Horst von Brand
2003-01-21  0:28 Cort Dougan
2003-01-21 19:22 Larry McVoy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3E296342.B3042E09@linux-m68k.org \
    --to=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lm@bitmover.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.