From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: reiserfs on redhat advanced server? Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 15:10:22 +0300 Message-ID: <3E3A67AE.4050601@namesys.com> References: <20030130173522.3aa4d0e1.pegasus@nerv.eu.org> <3E397A19.60409@namesys.com> <20030130234142.E8448@vestdata.no> <3E3A6071.6060102@namesys.com> <20030131115333.GC15359@marowsky-bree.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <20030131115333.GC15359@marowsky-bree.de> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" To: Lars Marowsky-Bree Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ragnar_Kj=F8rstad?= , Jure Pecar , reiserfs-list@namesys.com Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: >On 2003-01-31T14:39:29, > Hans Reiser said: > > =20 > >>If you want a stable kernel for a mission critical server, the only=20 >>thing that works is to ask around and find out what Marcelo kernel has=20 >>been known stable for at least 6 weeks. >> =20 >> > >And lose all support from RH or SuSE because you installed a non-supported >kernel image ;-) And thus violate the Oracle cert, the SAP cert (well, if = RH >had one), etc pp. > >Just something you can't do in some environments. > > >Sincerely, > Lars Marowsky-Br=E9e > > =20 > The distros are really doing their best to undermine the open source=20 community testing process that works so well....=20 for them to not certify/support a stable Marcelo kernel is.... well it=20 makes me angry quite honestly.... --=20 Hans