From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Yury Umanets <umka@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: reiserfs on redhat advanced server?
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 15:29:18 +0300
Message-ID: <3E3A6C1E.8010802@namesys.com>
References: <20030130173522.3aa4d0e1.pegasus@nerv.eu.org> <3E397A19.60409@namesys.com> <20030130234142.E8448@vestdata.no> <3E3A6071.6060102@namesys.com> <20030131115333.GC15359@marowsky-bree.de> <20030131150852.A14386@t-raenon.nmd.msu.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-12573-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <20030131150852.A14386@t-raenon.nmd.msu.ru>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: flx@msu.ru
Cc: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>, Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>, Ragnar Kj?rstad <reiserfs@ragnark.vestdata.no>, Jure Pecar <pegasus@nerv.eu.org>, reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Alexander Lyamin wrote:

>Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 12:53:34PM +0100, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>  
>
>>On 2003-01-31T14:39:29,
>>   Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com> said:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>If you want a stable kernel for a mission critical server, the only 
>>>thing that works is to ask around and find out what Marcelo kernel has 
>>>been known stable for at least 6 weeks.
>>>      
>>>
>>And lose all support from RH or SuSE because you installed a non-supported
>>kernel image ;-) And thus violate the Oracle cert, the SAP cert (well, if RH
>>had one), etc pp.
>>
>>Just something you can't do in some environments.
>>    
>>
>
>O.k. Its purely my private oppinion. and my own expirince talking here:
>
>Cant say that i benefited from SuSE support even once :)
>that's something you dont actually need on some expertise level.
>
>Oracle support might be valuable(since they really do kernel-tweaking for this monster), but its not an issue there, right? Even if NO, i made Oracle running on standart issue kernel once. Probably with some perfomance loss, have'nt tested it yet.
>
>The issue is high load (200k users) on this two puny workhorses.
>
>My expirience and Corban Dallas telling me "If you have to something done - do it yourself".
>
Actually it was saif not by Corban Dallas but rather by mr. Zorg. But, 
in general I'm agreed :)

>
>2.4.19 without doubts.
>reiserfsprogs version - lets ask Vitaly Fertman.
>
>
>P.S.
>most of tech.supports i bumped (even famous Cisco TAC) suck badly anyways, so who cares ? especially when you Open Source :)
>
>  
>
>>Sincerely,
>>    Lars Marowsky-Br?e <lmb@suse.de>
>>    
>>