From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: reiserfs on redhat advanced server?
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 17:23:30 +0300
Message-ID: <3E3A86E2.5070800@namesys.com>
References: <20030130173522.3aa4d0e1.pegasus@nerv.eu.org>	 <20030131160624.A12036@namesys.com>	 <1044021310.15684.154.camel@tiny.suse.com>	 <200301311458.59747.russell@coker.com.au> <1044022450.15685.171.camel@tiny.suse.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-12586-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <1044022450.15685.171.camel@tiny.suse.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
Cc: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>, reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Chris Mason wrote:

>  
>
>In the long term, the competition between us is good for linux, in the
>short term, we duplicate effort much more than we should.
>
>-chris
>
>
>
>  
>
This is a traditional capitalism vs. communism tradeoff.

-- 
Hans