From: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
reiser@namesys.com, jakob@unthought.net,
david.lang@digitalinsight.com, riel@conectiva.com.br,
ckolivas@yahoo.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
axboe@suse.de
Subject: Re: stochastic fair queueing in the elevator [Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.20-ck3 / aa / rmap with contest]
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 23:34:11 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E479C43.4050206@cyberone.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030210123006.GK31401@dualathlon.random
Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:27:13PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
>>Is there a magic number above which you see the improvement,
>>Andrea? Or does it steadily climb?
>>
>
>I recall more than 512k wasn't worthwhile anymore
>
Behaviour between 128 and 512 would be interesting then
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-10 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 100+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-09 13:30 [BENCHMARK] 2.4.20-ck3 / aa / rmap with contest Con Kolivas
2003-02-09 14:46 ` stochastic fair queueing in the elevator [Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.20-ck3 / aa / rmap with contest] Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 3:13 ` Nick Piggin
2003-02-10 3:52 ` Rik van Riel
2003-02-10 4:44 ` Nick Piggin
2003-02-10 5:15 ` usbaudio.c 2.5.59 John
2003-02-10 7:26 ` stochastic fair queueing in the elevator [Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.20-ck3 / aa / rmap with contest] Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 7:43 ` Nick Piggin
2003-02-10 3:42 ` Rik van Riel
2003-02-10 4:15 ` Rik van Riel
2003-02-10 4:19 ` David Lang
2003-02-10 4:29 ` Rik van Riel
2003-02-10 7:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 4:33 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-10 4:47 ` Rik van Riel
2003-02-10 7:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 4:51 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2003-02-10 4:58 ` Nick Piggin
2003-02-10 5:10 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2003-02-10 6:06 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-02-10 6:31 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2003-02-10 7:36 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 7:41 ` Nick Piggin
2003-02-10 8:08 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 8:19 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-10 8:56 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 9:09 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-10 9:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 10:07 ` Hans Reiser
2003-02-10 10:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 10:40 ` Nick Piggin
2003-02-10 11:10 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 11:21 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-10 11:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 11:24 ` Nick Piggin
2003-02-10 11:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 11:45 ` Nick Piggin
2003-02-10 12:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 12:11 ` Nick Piggin
2003-02-10 12:22 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 12:36 ` Nick Piggin
2003-02-10 12:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 13:26 ` Rik van Riel
2003-02-10 11:48 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-10 11:53 ` Nick Piggin
2003-02-10 12:10 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 12:14 ` Nick Piggin
2003-02-10 12:26 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 12:12 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-10 12:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 12:27 ` Nick Piggin
2003-02-10 12:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 12:34 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2003-02-10 12:43 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 12:55 ` Nick Piggin
2003-02-10 13:30 ` Rik van Riel
2003-02-11 19:13 ` Rod Van Meter
2003-02-10 12:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 12:17 ` Nick Piggin
2003-02-10 12:28 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 12:58 ` Hans Reiser
2003-02-10 13:18 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 20:14 ` Hans Reiser
2003-02-10 13:19 ` Nick Piggin
2003-02-10 14:49 ` stochastic fair queueing in the elevator [Re: [BENCHMARK] 2 Giuliano Pochini
2003-02-10 15:05 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 11:25 ` stochastic fair queueing in the elevator [Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.20-ck3 / aa / rmap with contest] Hans Reiser
2003-02-10 11:42 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-10 13:00 ` Hans Reiser
2003-02-10 10:48 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-10 10:55 ` Nick Piggin
2003-02-10 11:21 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 11:33 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-10 11:43 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 11:39 ` Nick Piggin
2003-02-10 9:59 ` Hans Reiser
2003-02-10 10:06 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-10 10:17 ` Hans Reiser
2003-02-10 10:39 ` Hans Reiser
2003-02-10 8:27 ` Nick Piggin
2003-02-10 9:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 9:18 ` Nick Piggin
2003-02-10 20:33 ` Kurt Garloff
2003-02-10 21:43 ` Rik van Riel
2003-02-10 5:01 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-10 7:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 4:44 ` Rik van Riel
2003-02-10 7:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 7:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-10 7:39 ` Nick Piggin
2003-02-10 10:03 ` stochastic fair queueing in the elevator [Re: [BENCHMARK] 2 Giuliano Pochini
2003-02-10 16:23 ` stochastic fair queueing in the elevator [Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.4.20-ck3 / aa / rmap with contest] Pavel Machek
2003-02-11 11:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-11 12:43 ` Jens Axboe
2003-02-11 14:28 ` Jason Lunz
2003-02-11 14:41 ` Jens Axboe
2003-02-11 17:17 ` Jason Lunz
2003-02-11 20:19 ` Jens Axboe
2003-02-10 16:47 ` Pavel Machek
2003-02-11 11:01 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E479C43.4050206@cyberone.com.au \
--to=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=ckolivas@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=david.lang@digitalinsight.com \
--cc=jakob@unthought.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.