From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Frank Baumgart <godot@upb.de>
Subject: Re: Corrupted/unreadable journal: reiser vs. ext3
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 12:24:24 +0100
Message-ID: <3E4A2EE8.9070609@upb.de>
References: <93F527C91A6ED411AFE10050040665D0049C06D5@corpusmx1.us.dg.com> <3E4A266E.2A258472@interface-ag.com> <3E4A28F8.2030506@namesys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-12708-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <3E4A28F8.2030506@namesys.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: Reiserfs List <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

> and if you can fit more data onto reiserfs partitions than onto ext3 
> partitions?  Is it a fair comparison to compare at equal percents full?

Beware of the trolls.

Frank


P.S.: reiserfs obviously needs some -o porn mount option :)