All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Crispin Cowan <crispin@wirex.com>
To: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Security Module <linux-security-module@wirex.com>
Subject: Re: What went wrong with LSM, was: Re: [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.59
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 22:52:18 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E4B40A2.70509@wirex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200302130512.h1D5CY909638@devserv.devel.redhat.com

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3365 bytes --]

Pete Zaitcev wrote:

>I used to be super irritated by separate lists. Now I'm a member
>of linux-usb-devel, uml-devel, sparclinux, and god knows what else.
>Yes, they are unavoidable. Still, it is important to keep linux-kernel
>at least somewhat informed. IMHO.
>
LKML was kept at least somewhat informed, IMHO:

    * LSM announced April 11, 2001
      <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=98695004126478&w=4>
    * Should there be separate lists for module development?
      <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=98695659813419&w=4>
          o Probably
            <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=98701977623500&w=4>
    * Discussion of the "DAC-out" design option appears in LKML July 12,
      2001
      <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=99497020101496&w=4>
    * LSM entangled in discussion of whether binary-only modules should
      be permitted, September 24, 2001
      <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=100134989121896&w=4>
    * Syscall 223 provisionally reserved for LSM
      <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=100255709403906&w=4>
    * LSM mentioned as related to extended attributes project
      <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=100509197600341&w=4>
    * Does LSM conflict with accessfs? January 16, 2002
      <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=101120760212957&w=4>
          o No, it does not
            <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=101138310816232&w=4>
    * LSM in Guillaume's big list of 2.5 stuff, January 23, 2002
      <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=101176727007672&w=4>
    * LSM in Marc-Christian Petersen's forked kernel, May 21, 2002
      <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=102201919806027&w=4>
    * LSM interfacing to extended attributes, June 28, 2002
      <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=102527059400830&w=4>
    * First LSM patch into Linus' tree, July 16, 2002
      <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=102677797911383&w=4>
          o There are lots of these subsequently, so I won't cite them all
    * Racing with module load/unload affects LSM too, September 12, 2002
      <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103181033207587&w=4>
    * HCH takes issue with LSM, September 26, 2002
      <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103307580006067&w=4>
    * LSM hook style changes from low-cost hooks to no-cost configurable
      hooks, October 16, 2002
      <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103472694817532&w=4>
    * LSM and GPL requirement for modules, October 17, 2002
      <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103486544115996&w=4>
    * Remove the LSM sys_security call, October 17, 2002
      <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103488104604175&w=4>
    * LSM changed so that module does not have to provision every hook
      by providing a default action, December 1, 2002
      <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=103872797618899&w=4>
    * The start of this flame-war, February 5, 2002
      <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=104441899708408&w=4>

Crispin

-- 
Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.
Chief Scientist, WireX                             http://wirex.com/~crispin/
Recruiting for Linux kernel and glibc developers:  http://immunix.org/jobs.html


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 252 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2003-02-13  6:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-12 16:58 [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.59 Makan Pourzandi (LMC)
2003-02-12 18:45 ` 'Christoph Hellwig'
2003-02-12 19:11 ` magniett
2003-02-12 18:38   ` 'Christoph Hellwig'
2003-02-12 22:22     ` Crispin Cowan
2003-02-12 23:05       ` What went wrong with LSM, was: " 'Christoph Hellwig'
2003-02-12 23:24         ` Jesse Pollard
2003-02-13  1:02         ` James Morris
2003-02-13  4:19           ` Crispin Cowan
     [not found]           ` <mailman.1045110181.1643.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2003-02-13  5:12             ` Pete Zaitcev
2003-02-13  6:52               ` Crispin Cowan [this message]
2003-02-13  1:56         ` Casey Schaufler
2003-02-13  4:37         ` Crispin Cowan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3E4B40A2.70509@wirex.com \
    --to=crispin@wirex.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@wirex.com \
    --cc=zaitcev@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.