From: Sander Alberink <alberink@stamppot.demon.nl>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Severe problem: data lost while adding a partition
Date: Mon Feb 17 16:12:01 2003 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E515E16.8050209@stamppot.demon.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030207152736.C27442@sistina.com>
Heinz, all,
I really appreciate your help in this. However, I am rather reluctant to
dive in and be hasty in my commands. I really don't want to destroy my
data....
As I understand it, pvcreate -ff would re-initialize the physical
volume. As I understand it, I will have to add them to a volume group
again. But will the filesystem still be intact after that then?
Sorry if this sound like a beginner question to you. It very well might
be, but I'd rather be careful....
Best regards,
Sander
>Sander,
>
>if you want to redo from scratch, "pvcreate -ff" the disks/partitions
>you want to use with LVM. Partitions need to have type 0x8E (Linux LVM).
>
>
>Regards,
>Heinz -- The LVM Guy --
>
>
>On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:48:27PM +0100, Sander Alberink wrote:
>
>
>>Heinz,
>>
>>Thanks for your reply, but I have some more questions....
>>
>>
>>
>>>can you tell what you mean with
>>>'...something went horribly wron during install...' ?
>>>
>>>Any particular messages which can help analyzing this ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Well, actually no real error messages, just a GUI installer that didn't
>>do what I expected it to do. However, the LVM was hosed already at the
>>time I realized something was wrong
>>
>>
>>
>>>If you don't have any, take your most recent LVM metedata from the archive
>>>(/etc/lvconf/ ; you've got a backup, right ?), figure out disks used as PVs
>>>with "vgcfgrestore -ll ..." and run "pvcreate -ff ..." and vgcfgresto
>>>on all of them. The archive you use shall _not_ include the recently added
>>>disk.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Well, guess what? The LVM used in Mandrake doesn't make a backup copy.
>>And of course I hadn't executed it myself.... So as such I cannot
>>restore the exact configuration. Is pvcreate still the way to go then?
>>Please advice!
>>
>>Best regards,
>>
>>Sander
>>
>>
>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Heinz -- The LVM Guy --
>>>
>>>
>>>On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 01:14:28AM +0100, Sander Alberink wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hello all,
>>>>
>>>>I write to you with a rather grave problem. I have a small LVM setup at
>>>>home, consisting of 4 partitions. These were created by the Mandrake 8.2
>>>> installation system. After deciding to upgrade the system to Mandrake
>>>>9.0, I found out that I had another partition lying around which was
>>>>also prepared for LVM use. I had meant for that disc to use later on in
>>>> a different scheme for my /usr partition but never got around to do it.
>>>>However, during installation I decided to add it to the LVM. The idea
>>>>was that I would extend the FS later (of course, I was not going to
>>>>involve this LVM setup in the rest of the installation, I would do all
>>>>that manually.)
>>>>
>>>>But as you probably guessed, something went horribly wrong during
>>>>install time and my LVM setup is properly hosed. I wanted to re-create
>>>>the setup, but alas: I forgot which was the disk that I added.
>>>>
>>>>The name of the LV (there was only 1) was home, the disks involved were
>>>>/dev/hda1, /dev/hda[4-6].
>>>>
>>>>Output of pvscan:
>>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>pvscan -- reading all physical volumes (this may take a while...)
>>>>pvscan -- walking through all physical volumes found
>>>>pvscan -- inactive PV "/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1" is
>>>>associated to an unknown VG (run vgscan)
>>>>pvscan -- inactive PV "/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part4" is
>>>>associated to an unknown VG (run vgscan)
>>>>pvscan -- inactive PV "/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part5" is
>>>>associated to an unknown VG (run vgscan)
>>>>pvscan -- inactive PV "/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part6" is
>>>>associated to an unknown VG (run vgscan)
>>>>pvscan -- inactive PV "/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part7" is
>>>>associated to an unknown VG (run vgscan)
>>>>pvscan -- total: 5 [1.97 GB] / in use: 5 [1.97 GB] / in no VG: 0 [0]
>>>>
>>>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>output of vgscan:
>>>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>vgscan -- reading all physical volumes (this may take a while...)
>>>>vgscan -- "/etc/lvmtab" and "/etc/lvmtab.d" successfully created
>>>>vgscan -- WARNING: This program does not do a VGDA backup of your volume
>>>>group
>>>>
>>>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>output of pvdisplay /dev/hda1 (this partition belonged to the LV for sure)
>>>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>pvdisplay -- getting physical volume size
>>>>--- Physical volume ---
>>>>PV Name /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1
>>>>VG Name home
>>>>PV Size 399.62 MB / NOT usable 3.62 MB [LVM: 121.00 KB]
>>>>PV# 1
>>>>PV Status NOT available
>>>>Allocatable yes (but full)
>>>>Cur LV 1
>>>>PE Size (KByte) 4096
>>>>Total PE 99
>>>>Free PE 0
>>>>Allocated PE 99
>>>>PV UUID NCf9U6-nqVy-zn3K-upFo-S0PB-SFqb-o2ERjs
>>>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>If you need any further information, please let me know!
>>>>I do hope you can help me with this, since I stand to loose a lot of
>>>>personal data, of which exists no backup (of course, you guys probably
>>>>hear this all the time).
>>>>
>>>>Best regards,
>>>>
>>>>Sander Alberink
>>>>
>>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-17 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-01 18:15 [linux-lvm] Severe problem: data lost while adding a partition Sander Alberink
2003-02-03 4:35 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2003-02-06 15:49 ` Sander Alberink
2003-02-07 8:31 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2003-02-17 16:12 ` Sander Alberink [this message]
2003-02-17 16:17 ` Steven Lembark
2003-02-25 16:43 ` Sander Alberink
2003-03-04 15:07 ` Sander Alberink
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-01 18:15 Sander Alberink
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E515E16.8050209@stamppot.demon.nl \
--to=alberink@stamppot.demon.nl \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.