From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: Corrupted/unreadable journal: reiser vs. ext3 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 01:18:21 +0300 Message-ID: <3E52B12D.2040009@namesys.com> References: <3E4AA902.86F15815@interface-ag.com> <200302151600.35675.vitaly@namesys.com> <3E528EA1.60604@namesys.com> <200302182305.08021.vitaly@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <200302182305.08021.vitaly@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Vitaly Fertman Cc: Andreas Dilger , Oleg Drokin , Zygo Blaxell , reiserfs-list@namesys.com Vitaly Fertman wrote: >>>If fix-fixable finds fatal corruptions it sets FS_FATAL what means that >>>the second run of fix-fixable will not help to avoid another fsck run at >>>the next boot. >>> >>> >>Can you repeat what you said (more clearly). >> >> > >If fs was not fixed, you do not want to have another run of fsck at >the next boot. you already know that there are fatal corruptions and >you need to run rebuild-tree manually. So a special flag saying that >would be helpful. > > > ok, along with special messages clearly explaining it to the user at each boot, yes? -- Hans