All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Retrieving linuxppc_2_4_devel corresponding to 2.4.19?
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 16:44:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E52D37C.3010608@kegel.com> (raw)


What's the best way to retrieve linuxppc_2_4_devel as of
2.4.19?  Browsing through http://ppc.bkbits.net:8080/linuxppc_2_4_devel
I see that the right changeset appears to be 1.1091.1.23
(Lord only knows what those numbers mean):

 > ChangeSet@1.1091.1.23, 2002-08-03 16:26:58+10:00, paulus@samba.org
 >   Merge samba.org:/home/paulus/kernel/linuxppc_2_4
 >   into samba.org:/home/paulus/kernel/linuxppc_2_4_devel

The magic recipe we receved from the gods to retrieve that version is

ver=1.1091.1.23
bk clone -r$ver bk://ppc.bkserver.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel linuxppc_2_4_devel-$ver
cd linuxppc_2_4_devel-$ver
find . -type d -exec bk get {} \;
find . -name SCCS -print | xargs rm -rf
rm -rf RESYNC/
rm -rf PENDING/
rm -rf BitKeeper/
rm -f ChangeSet


That seems to work.  However, I'm a bit concerned for several reasons:
0. it looks pretty hacky
1. there's no label on the changeset in question
2. Tom Rini said:
   "... keep in mind that revision numbers are not constant, only TAGs,
     and keys.  Poking in the BK help should tell you how to go from
     a rev to a key, and then back."
So I'm afraid that magic 1.1091.1.23 is going to get renumbered
sometime, and I'll have no way to retrieve a 2.4.19 that
works on ppc405.  Poking around on bitkeeper.com's online
doc revealed no discussion of "keys", so I'm a bit mystified.

Can the list comment on the recipe I use to
retrieve a clean kernel source tree, and
on what the heck Tom Rini was talking about
with converting from a rev to a key and back?

Also, I see from the bitkeeper logs that linuxppc_2_4_devel
gets merged into from both linuxppc_2_4 and Linus's tree.
Am I right in assuming that I still want linuxppc_2_4_devel
for ppc405 support?

Thanks,
Dan

--
Dan Kegel
http://www.kegel.com
http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

             reply	other threads:[~2003-02-19  0:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-19  0:44 Dan Kegel [this message]
2003-02-19 17:39 ` Retrieving linuxppc_2_4_devel corresponding to 2.4.19? Tom Rini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3E52D37C.3010608@kegel.com \
    --to=dank@kegel.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.