From: Robert Rati <Robert.Rati@motorola.com>
To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: mountd through a firewall?
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:56:46 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E540BAE.9090903@motorola.com> (raw)
I post this question a few days ago, but go no response. I hope someone
on the list can help with this issue or point me in another direction.
When I start rpc.mountd, I notice that it always registers 4 ports with
portmapper. 2 TCP and 2 UDP, which corespond to two separate instances
of mountd. When I run exportfs, I see that no file systems are being
exported. If I export a file system, the only difference is exportfs
shows a file system being exported. This will obviously cause a problem
if I try to specify a port for rpc.mountd to run on as both instances of
mountd try to use the same port and the tcp bind for the second instance
fails. Why does rpc.mountd start two instances of mountd?
This issue comes from trying to allow an NFS export through a firewall.
Since mountd uses different ports each time it starts, it's nearly
impossible to pass it through a firewall. Does anyone have an alternate
solution to this problem besides telling rpc.mountd to run on a
specified port (as that isn't working as detailed above). I'm stuck
using kernel 2.2.17, so I've been unable to check out the nfs-utils
ability to handle specifying a port for mountd.
Rob
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next reply other threads:[~2003-02-19 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-19 22:56 Robert Rati [this message]
2003-02-20 14:10 ` mountd through a firewall? Ion Badulescu
2003-02-20 16:36 ` Robert Rati
2003-02-20 17:10 ` Ion Badulescu
2003-02-20 17:27 ` Robert Rati
2003-02-20 17:35 ` Ion Badulescu
2003-02-20 17:48 ` Robert Rati
2003-02-20 18:22 ` Ion Badulescu
2003-02-20 21:27 ` Robert Rati
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E540BAE.9090903@motorola.com \
--to=robert.rati@motorola.com \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.