From: Mike Sullivan <mike.sullivan@alltec.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Scheduling with Hyperthreading
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 02:43:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E5B1EB8.2090601@alltec.com> (raw)
Sorry, should have been more specific. I am referring to the scheduler.
I have noticed
that if I run two compute intensive jobs on a Dual Xeon, the processes
run on separate
physical cpus and can spend a significant amount of time with both on a
single
cpu. I have seen some patches that try to improve on this and was
wondering if
they have made it into the production kernel stream. I ran tests on a
2.4.20 kernel and
it had the same problem as a 2.4.18 kernel.
Thanks
Mike
William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Mike Sullivan wrote:
>
>
>>>What kernel versions will attempt to distribute jobs across physical CPUs on
>>>Xeon SMP configurations.
>>>
>>>
>
>On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:45:18PM -0700, James Bourne wrote:
>
>
>>From what I've heard, Arjans' user space daemon might be the way
>>things are going, it's at http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/irqbalance/ .
>>The other way that you might try is the irq load balance patch that Ingo
>>produced. There is a patch that is from 2.4.20 at
>>http://www.hardrock.org/kernel/2.4.20/ and it is what I'm using at work on
>>our current Xeon systems (until I have the chance to test the user space
>>daemon at least).
>>
>>
>
>I think he's referring to the cpu scheduler, not interrupt load
>balancing. mingo might have some insight into current patches for
>this and current results thereof. I don't really participate in
>the scheduler aside from very occasional bugfixing.
>
>
>-- wli
>
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Sullivan Director Performance Computing
@lliance Technologies, Voice: (416) 385-3255,
18 Wynford Dr, Suite 407 Fax: (416) 385-1774
Toronto, ON, Canada, M3C-3S2 Toll Free:1-877-216-3199
http://www.alltec.com
next reply other threads:[~2003-02-25 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-25 7:43 Mike Sullivan [this message]
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302251616300.31810-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2003-02-25 21:23 ` Scheduling with Hyperthreading Mike Sullivan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-25 21:21 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302250852190.26386-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2003-02-25 21:01 ` Mike Sullivan
2003-02-25 1:04 Scheduling with HyperThreading Mike Sullivan
2003-02-25 5:45 ` James Bourne
2003-02-25 5:59 ` William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E5B1EB8.2090601@alltec.com \
--to=mike.sullivan@alltec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.