From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: reiserfsprogs 3.6.5-pre2 release.
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:27:08 +0300
Message-ID: <3E5CA48C.5070807@namesys.com>
References: <200302251650.22469.vitaly@namesys.com> <200302251712.45985.vitaly@namesys.com> <20030226015448.1efac468.philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com> <20030226102934.A2659@namesys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-12930-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <20030226102934.A2659@namesys.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>
Cc: Philippe Gramoull? <philippe.gramoulle@mmania.com>, reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Oleg Drokin wrote:

>Hello!
>
>On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 01:54:48AM +0100, Philippe Gramoull? wrote:
>  
>
>># time reiserfsck -a /dev/sdb1
>>Reiserfs super block in block 16 on 0x811 of format 3.6 with standard journal
>>Blocks (total/free): 143109020/59148009 by 4096 bytes
>>Filesystem is cleanly umounted
>>Replaying journal..
>>0 transactions replayed
>>Checking internal tree..finished                  
>>real    0m47.890s
>>user    0m6.668s
>>sys     0m0.732s
>>    
>>
>
>Thanks for trying.
>48 seconds is much longer than we expected such test should take.
>Was the system loaded at the time of test?
>
>Bye,
>    Oleg
>
>
>  
>
Yes, 48 seconds is too long to be acceptable.

-- 
Hans