From: Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>
To: linux@trios.org
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel source spellchecker
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 21:36:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E62E9D3.60103@kegel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1046661777.7527.518.camel@spc1.mesatop.com>
"Jared Daniel J. Smith" wrote:
> Even a single lost pun because of overenthusiastic spellchecking is
> not worth the cleanup. I would prefer to see typos than lose a single
> intentional 'misspelling'. It would be best if you posted all changes
> somewhere so that they could be verified manually.
>
> Consider the following:
>
> alignment=alignement
> alignmement is French; is this intentional?
No. All three instances were english typos.
> constants=konstants
> konstants is German; is this intentional?
No. All three instances were english typos.
> consumer=comsumer
> comsumer is a neologism: http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue5_5/henshall/
That may be, but in the neologism, it seems to be usually partially capitalized,
and the C source sure looks like just a typo:
/* producer/comsumer pointers for Tx/Rx ring */
> Converted=Coverted
> is it a pun on something 'hidden' or is it something transformed?
Allan said it was a copy/paste error and should be fixed.
> descriptor=decriptor,desciptor
> is it descriptor or decrypter?
You be the judge:
/* Initiliaze Transmit/Receive decriptor and CR3/4 */
All instances I saw were just english typos.
> invocation=invokation
> invokation is German; is this intentional?
No idea, seems to be gone in the current kernel source?
> negative=negativ
> negativ is a legitimate non-English word; is this intentional?
Where I spot-checked it, it was always just an English typo.
> signaled=signalled
> signaling=Signalling
> signaling=signalling
> signalled is a legitimate alternate spelling of signaled.
Thanks, fixed!
> succeeded=succeded
> succeded could also be a typo for 'succeed'
>
> through=throught,throuth
> throught could also be a typo for 'thought'
Yes. These will have to be hand-reviewed. I do recommend absolutely
every change be hand-reviewed just in case.
> writable=writeable
> writeable is a legitimate alternate spelling of writable
You're right, though I had to dig to find a dictionary that agreed with you.
I've updated http://www.kegel.com/kerspell to remove the "signall*" and "writeable"
corrections. (My stoplist already listed them as acceptable, fwiw.)
Thanks!
- Dan
--
Dan Kegel
http://www.kegel.com
http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-03 5:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-27 6:59 [PATCH] kernel source spellchecker Dan Kegel
[not found] ` <1046330232.15763.97.camel@localhost.localdomain>
2003-03-01 5:38 ` Dan Kegel
2003-03-01 14:11 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2003-03-01 17:13 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2003-03-01 18:54 ` Dan Kegel
2003-03-01 19:18 ` Steven Cole
2003-03-01 21:20 ` Dan Kegel
2003-03-02 3:45 ` jw schultz
2003-03-02 2:08 ` Dan Kegel
2003-03-02 3:02 ` Dan Kegel
2003-03-02 3:54 ` Steven Cole
2003-03-02 8:04 ` Dan Kegel
2003-03-02 4:16 ` Steven Cole
2003-03-02 8:21 ` Dan Kegel
2003-03-02 8:40 ` jw schultz
2003-03-02 11:21 ` David Woodhouse
2003-03-02 13:49 ` Steven Cole
2003-03-02 14:55 ` David Woodhouse
2003-03-02 22:44 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-02 22:59 ` John Bradford
2003-03-03 2:29 ` Dan Kegel
[not found] ` <3E62C0FF.1090700@kegel.com>
[not found] ` <1046661777.7527.518.camel@spc1.mesatop.com>
2003-03-03 5:36 ` Dan Kegel [this message]
[not found] ` <3E62E4C0.9070103@kegel.com>
[not found] ` <1046668274.7527.533.camel@spc1.mesatop.com>
2003-03-03 5:48 ` Dan Kegel
2003-03-02 15:35 ` Dan Kegel
2003-03-02 8:09 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2003-03-02 8:13 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2003-03-02 3:29 ` Steven Cole
2003-03-01 19:30 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2003-03-01 20:33 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2003-03-01 21:25 ` Dan Kegel
2003-03-01 21:25 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2003-03-02 9:15 ` John Bradford
2003-03-02 9:31 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2003-03-02 3:16 ` Horst von Brand
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-01 15:57 shaheed
2003-03-01 16:35 ` Jörn Engel
2003-03-01 18:01 ` shaheed
2003-03-01 18:31 ` Jörn Engel
2003-03-05 18:10 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] <20030301160017$56fc@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-03-01 18:39 ` Pascal Schmidt
2003-03-02 18:56 Jared Daniel J. Smith
2003-03-02 17:22 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2003-03-02 17:47 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-03-02 18:28 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2003-03-02 18:46 ` Steven Cole
2003-03-02 22:32 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E62E9D3.60103@kegel.com \
--to=dank@kegel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@trios.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.