Re: Better CLONE_SETTLS support for Hammer

[Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Andi Kleen wrote:

> If you just want to save one mmap/allocation: I think the context switch
> overhead will be more expensive than the allocation.

And two more things:

1. every process will already use the prctl(ARCH_SET_FS).  We are
talking here only about the 2nd thread and later.  We need to use
prctl(ARCH_SET_FS) for TLS support.


2. May I remind you that you were in the crowd who complained when we
requested a dedicated thread register?  Yes, I still would prefer that
but I have no energy to battle for that.

- -- 
- --------------.                        ,-.            444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \    ,-----------------'   \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat         `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+ZlDV2ijCOnn/RHQRAncTAJ9TOHCpPZKWqD/1BeZVpzGenYvtZACcDaYJ
Y1kyJd90RT60PpyjnR9q1Mg=
=WADr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----