From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 17:35:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E67F76E.4050709@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303070215490.32518-100000@serv>
Roman Zippel wrote:
>
> Why would it be awkward? libgcc has the same problem, so they added this
> paragraph:
>
> In addition to the permissions in the GNU General Public License, the
> Free Software Foundation gives you unlimited permission to link the
> compiled version of this file into combinations with other programs,
> and to distribute those combinations without any restriction coming
> from the use of this file. (The General Public License restrictions
> do apply in other respects; for example, they cover modification of
> the file, and distribution when not linked into a combine
> executable.)
>
> Why can't we do something similiar?
>
Why does it matter?
>
>> Furthermore, I'm the author of most of the
>>code in there, and if someone really wants to rip it off it's not a huge
>>deal to me.
>
> If it becomes part of the kernel (and a core part, not just some driver),
> it would be awkward to have a completely different license, so this should
> not be done without a very good reason.
>
Why is it awkward?
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-07 1:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-07 0:16 [BK PATCH] klibc for 2.5.64 - try 2 Greg KH
2003-03-07 1:02 ` Roman Zippel
2003-03-07 1:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-03-07 1:23 ` Roman Zippel
2003-03-07 1:35 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2003-03-07 9:55 ` Roman Zippel
2003-03-07 13:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-03-07 15:33 ` Kai Germaschewski
2003-03-07 19:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-03-07 18:37 ` Roman Zippel
2003-03-07 18:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-07 21:55 ` Roman Zippel
2003-03-07 23:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-07 23:36 ` Greg KH
2003-03-07 23:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-07 23:55 ` Greg KH
2003-03-08 0:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-08 0:54 ` Greg KH
2003-03-07 23:39 ` Russell King
2003-03-07 23:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-03-08 0:00 ` Russell King
2003-03-08 0:38 ` Roman Zippel
2003-03-08 0:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-03-08 1:27 ` Roman Zippel
2003-03-12 17:27 ` Pavel Machek
2003-03-13 0:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-03-08 0:46 ` David Lang
2003-03-08 1:49 ` Roman Zippel
2003-03-08 2:00 ` David Lang
2003-03-08 2:26 ` Roman Zippel
2003-03-08 16:55 ` Roman Zippel
2003-03-08 17:06 ` Vlad@geekizoid.com
2003-03-08 2:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <20030308100359.A27153@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
2003-03-08 15:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-03-08 16:13 ` Russell King
2003-03-08 17:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-03-08 21:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-03-09 2:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-03-09 2:30 ` Larry McVoy
2003-03-09 11:32 ` Daniel Egger
2003-03-09 11:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-03-09 14:19 ` Daniel Egger
2003-03-10 0:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-03-10 1:40 ` Daniel Egger
2003-03-10 6:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-03-10 20:33 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2003-03-10 22:02 ` Daniel Egger
2003-03-08 20:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-03-08 21:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-03-09 1:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-03-09 1:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-03-09 2:37 ` Eric W. Biederman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-07 19:21 Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-07 21:04 ` Alan Cox
[not found] <1047106664.22024.0.camel@rth.ninka.net>
2003-03-08 15:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-08 16:03 ` David S. Miller
2003-03-08 16:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-08 16:22 ` David S. Miller
2003-03-08 17:07 ` Larry McVoy
2003-03-08 20:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-08 21:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-03-08 20:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-03-09 1:24 ` Roman Zippel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E67F76E.4050709@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.