All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: george anzinger <george@mvista.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 350] New: i386 context switch very slow compared to 2.4 due to wrmsr (performance)
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 18:22:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E77D46F.5070709@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b58edl$au1$1@cesium.transmeta.com>

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Followup to:  <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303181113590.13708-100000@home.transmeta.com>
> By author:    Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> 
>>Wow. There aren't many things that AMD tends to show the P4-like "big
>>latency in rare cases" behaviour.
>>
>>But quite honestly, I think they made the right call, and I _expect_ that
>>of modern CPU's. The fact is, modern CPU's tend to need to pre-decode the
>>instruction stream some way, and storing to it while running from it is
>>just a really really bad idea. And since it's so easy to avoid it, you
>>really just shouldn't do it.
>>
> 
> 
> AMD, I believe, has an "annotated" icache

Here is an SMP:

vendor_id	: AuthenticAMD
cpu family	: 6
model		: 6
model name	: AMD Athlon(TM) MP 2000+
stepping	: 2
cpu MHz		: 1680.368
cache size	: 256 KB

empty overhead=11 cycles
load overhead=6 cycles
I$ load overhead=5 cycles
I$ load overhead=6 cycles
I$ store overhead=1051 cycles


-- 
George Anzinger   george@mvista.com
High-res-timers:  http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml


  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-19  2:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-12  1:35 [Bug 350] New: i386 context switch very slow compared to 2.4 due to wrmsr (performance) Martin J. Bligh
2003-02-12  2:59 ` Dave Jones
2003-02-12  4:21   ` Jamie Lokier
2003-02-12  5:49     ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-12 10:12       ` Jamie Lokier
2003-03-10  3:07         ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-10 11:06           ` Andi Kleen
2003-03-10 18:33             ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-10 22:44           ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-12 12:54     ` Dave Jones
2003-02-12  7:50   ` Andi Kleen
2003-02-12 10:27     ` Jamie Lokier
2003-02-12 10:45       ` Andi Kleen
2003-02-12 17:52         ` Ingo Oeser
2003-02-12 18:13           ` Dave Jones
2003-02-12 18:18           ` Andi Kleen
2003-02-13  2:42             ` Alan Cox
2003-02-13  5:17         ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-02-13 18:07           ` Andi Kleen
2003-02-14  0:14             ` [discuss] " Peter Tattam
2003-02-14  1:29               ` Andi Kleen
2003-02-14  1:51               ` Eric Northup
2003-02-14  2:01                 ` Peter Tattam
2003-02-14  4:07                   ` Thomas J. Merritt
2003-02-14  9:38                     ` Peter Finderup Lund
2003-02-14  8:27               ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-03-19  1:22             ` Rob Landley
2003-02-12  4:18 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-02-12  5:54   ` Linus Torvalds
2003-02-12 10:18     ` Jamie Lokier
2003-02-12 17:24       ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-18 15:24     ` Kevin Pedretti
2003-03-18 16:41       ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-18 18:30         ` Brian Gerst
2003-03-18 19:14           ` Thomas Molina
2003-03-18 19:21           ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-18 20:03             ` Thomas Schlichter
2003-03-18 20:24             ` Steven Cole
2003-03-19  0:42             ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-03-19  2:22               ` george anzinger [this message]
     [not found] <20030318165013$55f4@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <20030318184010$6448@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-03-18 20:19   ` Pascal Schmidt
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-19  9:55 Ph. Marek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3E77D46F.5070709@mvista.com \
    --to=george@mvista.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.