From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: Snapshots a la NetApp? Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 23:49:42 +0300 Message-ID: <3E7F6F66.5050808@namesys.com> References: <200303221822.34401.phma@webjockey.net> <33433.10.20.2.148.1048390681.squirrel@alpha> <1048411014.1427.5.camel@wusel.schnulli.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <1048411014.1427.5.camel@wusel.schnulli.de> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Heinz-Josef Claes Cc: kend@xanoptix.com, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Heinz-Josef Claes wrote: >Am Son, 2003-03-23 um 04.38 schrieb kend@xanoptix.com: > > >>I'm just wondering if there's any development being done on NetApp-like >>snapshots. (This differs from LVM snapshots in that it's file-by-file, >>instead of volume based.) If not, has anyone given it any consideration? >>It would be a huge win for the RAID-in-a-box folks, and, speaking as a >>sysadmin, is something about which I dream frequently. >> >>Just curious... >> >>Ken D'Ambrosio >>Sr. SysAdmin, >>Xanoptix, Inc. >> >> > >Hi, >you can look at the URL below. It's a kind of snapshot inspired by >NetApp, but has nothing to do with LVM or the filesystem. It also has a >different behaviour. > > > I didn't find the magic click that gave me the design doc for storebackup, could you post it to the list? -- Hans