All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luben Tuikov <luben@splentec.com>
To: Patrick Mansfield <patmans@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 4/7 cleanup/consolidate code in scsi_request_fn
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 12:07:25 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E81DE4D.7060407@splentec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030325165822.A1383@beaverton.ibm.com

Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> I don't care much one way or the other, but I don't like ok2queue.
> 
> I was using sdev to distinguish the name from struct dev and functions
> related to struct dev. We already have the confusing names scsi_device_get
> and scsi_get_device - one for a "get" of a scsi_device one to get a
> struct dev given a scsi_host. And then the shost naming matches sdev.
> 
> Anyway, the following are fine with me:
> 	scsi_dev_ready, scsi_host_ready
> 	scsi_sdev_ready, scsi_shost_ready
> 

The problem here is _again_ the implicitness of your definitions.
``ready'' is not better than ``check''.  Why?

result = X_ready(arg) --> whatever result, the question is
``ready (or not) _for__what_????''

-- 
Luben



  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-26 17:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-25  1:53 [PATCH] 0/7 per scsi_device queue lock patches Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-25  1:54 ` [PATCH] 1/7 starved changes - use a list_head for starved queue's Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-25  2:02   ` [PATCH] 2/7 add missing scsi_queue_next_request calls Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-25  2:02     ` [PATCH] 3/7 consolidate single_lun code Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-25  2:03       ` [PATCH] 4/7 cleanup/consolidate code in scsi_request_fn Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-25  2:03         ` [PATCH] 5/7 alloc a request_queue on each scsi_alloc_sdev call Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-25  2:03           ` [PATCH] 6/7 add and use a per-scsi_device queue_lock Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-25  2:04             ` [PATCH] 7/7 fix single_lun code for " Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-25 21:23               ` Luben Tuikov
2003-03-26 21:47                 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-26 22:12                   ` Luben Tuikov
2003-03-25 21:03             ` [PATCH] 6/7 add and use a " Luben Tuikov
2003-03-26 21:33               ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-25 21:20             ` James Bottomley
2003-03-26  2:01               ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-27 16:09                 ` James Bottomley
2003-03-28  0:30                   ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-25  7:12           ` [PATCH] 5/7 alloc a request_queue on each scsi_alloc_sdev call Christoph Hellwig
2003-03-25  7:18             ` Jens Axboe
2003-03-25 21:32         ` [PATCH] 4/7 cleanup/consolidate code in scsi_request_fn Luben Tuikov
2003-03-26  0:58           ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-26 17:07             ` Luben Tuikov [this message]
2003-03-26 17:13               ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-26 17:25                 ` Luben Tuikov
2003-03-25 20:36       ` [PATCH] 3/7 consolidate single_lun code Luben Tuikov
2003-03-26 19:11         ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-26 22:05           ` Luben Tuikov
2003-03-27 22:43             ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-28 15:09               ` Luben Tuikov
2003-03-28 20:06                 ` Patrick Mansfield
2003-03-25 20:50       ` Luben Tuikov
2003-03-25 19:41     ` [PATCH] 2/7 add missing scsi_queue_next_request calls Luben Tuikov
2003-03-25 19:39   ` [PATCH] 1/7 starved changes - use a list_head for starved queue's Luben Tuikov
2003-03-27 16:14 ` [PATCH] 0/7 per scsi_device queue lock patches James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3E81DE4D.7060407@splentec.com \
    --to=luben@splentec.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patmans@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.