From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Friedrich Lobenstock Subject: Re: extra/pptp-conntrack-nat.patch Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 14:44:57 +0200 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <3E883849.3050706@fl.priv.at> References: <3E8832B4.8030901@fl.priv.at> <20030331123134.GN7718@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist Return-path: To: Harald Welte In-Reply-To: <20030331123134.GN7718@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Harald Welte wrote: > > actually, _with_ the '//' in front, it accepts packets with broken > checksums. If you remove the '//' in front, it will not consider > packets with broken checksums. > > So W2k should work with the shipped patch ! (IIRC, it works in both > cases) > So I conclude that there is not a W2k at the other side (I missinterpreted the comment ion the patch the other way round) because I needed to remove the '//' to get it working. But when I ask the people what they've got as PPTP-Server they tell me it's a W2k server. I'm using the patch that's in pom-20030107. Could that make a difference? As a side note, I do the following: PPTP-Client --> Devil-Linux-Firewall -->...Internet....--> PPTP-Server At least it works now but it looks like a mistery now. -- MfG / Regards Friedrich Lobenstock