From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Heinz Subject: Re: Table duplication on smp machine Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:06:49 +0200 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <3E884B79.2070301@hipac.org> References: <3E881DD6.8090206@hipac.org> <20030331110709.GE7718@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <3E882F52.1040705@hipac.org> <20030331123326.GO7718@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <20030331125610.GC1098@oknodo.bof.de> <3E8843DD.8060501@hipac.org> <20030331134504.GD1098@oknodo.bof.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Harald Welte , netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Patrick Schaaf Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Hi Patrick You wrote: > Regarding the limit target, not current implementation, but seen > a bit more abstractly, it is possible to arrange things so each > CPU has its own copy of a partial token bucket, and refills it > from locked shared pingponging storage only when it empties. Indeed a good example. Thank you. Regards Thomas