From: Vladimir Milovanovic <vlad@webmail.co.za>
To: Illtud Daniel <illtud.daniel@llgc.org.uk>
Cc: raid-list <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: XP RAID vs md
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 11:21:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E8D4E8C.7080503@webmail.co.za> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3E8D463F.98EFBF1F@llgc.org.uk
Well Daniel what is your take on this? I am very interested in this
since I am working on a project which has to use RAID, and performance
is paramount (after reliability of course). I need to make a decision,
and I would like very much to stick with md, since it is what I know and
am used to. But if one can get huge performance margins using XP, then I
am going to have to consider that.
Cheers,
Vlad.
Illtud Daniel wrote:
>[posted & mailed]
>
>Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>
>
>
>>>Wow... I hope that one of the maintainers will comment on this, I didn't
>>>even know that XP had a sw RAID implementation. Up to 100% more on read
>>>and 60% more on write is quite a significant margin. Is there anything
>>>in favour of the md driver if this is true?
>>>
>>>
>>I've not really checked these numbers yet, so take the following with a grain
>>of salt.
>>
>>
>
>Have a look at http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2002/HPL-2002-352.pdf
>- that'll tell you were the figures are from - the 100% is worst-case.
>
>
>
>>However, with RAID1 for example, I got approximately twice the read speed and
>>95% of the write speed (compared to just using a single disk).
>>
>>
>
>One thing I forgot to mention in my post is that this is all (AFAICS)
>RAID0.
>
>
>
>>I have a really hard time imagining a 100% read boost; that would simply
>>exceed disk bandwidth, and 60% writes - how should that work?
>>
>>
>
>The md driver seriously underperforms at certain request sizes, and
>is generally underperforming. The average boost is less, but still about
>40-60% read and 30-40% write. XP's RAID0 is better than JBOD above a
>certain request size, which is pretty good.
>
>
>
>>I'm not claiming md is perfect or the fastest imaginable solution, but it is
>>rather close to theoretical disk bandwidth. A two digit percentage performance
>>improvement just can't be done.
>>
>>
>
>Well, that's why I asked in my original post for people to look at
>the report. Is isn't that long and it's pretty clear (although short
>on config details).
>
>--
>Illtud Daniel illtud.daniel@llgc.org.uk
>Uwch Ddadansoddwr Systemau Senior Systems Analyst
>Llyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru National Library of Wales
>Yn siarad drosof fy hun, nid LlGC - Speaking personally, not for NLW
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-04 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-02 12:19 XP RAID vs md Vladimir Milovanovic
2003-04-02 15:27 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2003-04-02 20:35 ` Scott McDermott
2003-04-04 8:45 ` Illtud Daniel
2003-04-04 9:21 ` Vladimir Milovanovic [this message]
2003-04-04 9:46 ` Illtud Daniel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-02 15:17 Rechenberg, Andrew
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E8D4E8C.7080503@webmail.co.za \
--to=vlad@webmail.co.za \
--cc=illtud.daniel@llgc.org.uk \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.