From: george anzinger <george@mvista.com>
To: Aniruddha M Marathe <aniruddha.marathe@wipro.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chandrashekhar RS <chandra.smurthy@wipro.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] settimeofday(2) succeeds for microsecond value more than USEC_PER_SEC and for negative value
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 23:26:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E966009.1060501@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94F20261551DC141B6B559DC491086723E0EB7@blr-m3-msg.wipro.com>
Aniruddha M Marathe wrote:
> Settimeofday(2) should return EINVAL in case where tv.tv_usec parameter is more than
> USEC_PER_SEC (more than 10^6 ) or for negative values of tv.tv_usec.
> It returns 0 (success) instead.
>
> Clock_settimeofday(2) (kernel/posix-timers.c) also uses do_sys_settimeofday() and faces the
> Same problem.
>
> I think this is a bug. If you confirm, I will send a patch.
Yes, it is a known problem, turned up by some the posix timers tests.
I suppose it is too much to ask, but it would be nice if
do_sys_settimeofday() took a timespec instead of a timeval. Of course
this changes the interface for all the archs, but it would allow the
clock_settimeofday to send in the nsec value.
-g
>
> Regards,
> Aniruddha Marathe
> WIPRO Technologies, India
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
George Anzinger george@mvista.com
High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-11 6:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-11 5:12 [BUG] settimeofday(2) succeeds for microsecond value more than USEC_PER_SEC and for negative value Aniruddha M Marathe
2003-04-11 6:26 ` george anzinger [this message]
2003-04-11 13:33 ` [BUG] settimeofday(2) succeeds for microsecond value more thanUSEC_PER_SEC " Eric Piel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-11 13:07 [BUG] settimeofday(2) succeeds for microsecond value more than USEC_PER_SEC " Aniruddha M Marathe
2003-04-11 21:36 ` george anzinger
2003-05-02 18:06 ` Urs Thuermann
2003-04-12 10:43 Aniruddha M Marathe
2003-04-12 19:25 ` george anzinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E966009.1060501@mvista.com \
--to=george@mvista.com \
--cc=aniruddha.marathe@wipro.com \
--cc=chandra.smurthy@wipro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.