From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Friedrich Lobenstock Subject: Re: extra/pptp-conntrack-nat.patch Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 18:40:34 +0200 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <3E96F002.5000700@fl.priv.at> References: Reply-To: Netfilter Development Mailinglist Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: To: Netfilter Development Mailinglist In-Reply-To: Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Ilguiz Latypov wrote: > > Are you connecting to the Windows server from the Linux machine where PPTP > connection tracking modules are loaded? No. It looks like this: Windows-PC ---------> Linux Firewall --------------> Windows Server PPTP-Client connection tracking PPTP-Server private IP private official IP IP > If this is true, you would be affected by the modules' rewriting of call > IDs in one direction only when you were running the unmodified version. I don't see a connection to a bad checksum here? > > To be able to connect from such Linux machine to another PPTP server, you > need to apply the pending local NAT patch from the netfilter patch-o-matic > and enable the CONFIG_NF_NAT_LOCAL option in the kernel. > > There would be nothing Windows specific in this case. I don't think that I need the local nat stuff, do I? PS: Can I tell the runme script of patch-o-matic to list all applied patches? As far as I know it only shows the applied patches when you tell it to apply some patches, but I can not export this list to a file. -- MfG / Regards Friedrich Lobenstock ____________________________________________________________________ Friedrich Lobenstock Linux Services Lobenstock URL: http://www.lsl.at/ Email: fl@fl.priv.at ____________________________________________________________________