From: Herman Oosthuysen <Herman@WirelessNetworksInc.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: How did the Spelling Police miss this one?
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 09:44:59 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EA8067B.20108@WirelessNetworksInc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030424150950.GW10374@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
This is getting funnier by the day!
Even the word 'normal' is a religious term. It literally means to be a
good Christian - a Gentleman. Christian seminaries are 'Normal Schools'
and have 'Normal Classes'. Yes, there was a time when I was forced to
attend 'Normal Class' - it didn't help - I became a heathen...
Maybe we should switch to Zen Buddist terminology instead, it is less
violent.
For what it is worth, I grew up with the software term 'normalize'.
'Canonize' seems a bit too strong for my tase.
viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 10:46:06AM -0400, Timothy Miller wrote:
>
>
>>On the other hand, "canonicalize", while strange and new, unambiguously
>>means (b).
>>
>>Is there an already-existing word which means (b)?
>
>
> % webster normalize
> nor-mal-ize \'no[0xC7]r-me-,l[0xF5]^-z\ vt -ized; -iz-ing
> (1865)
> 1: to make conform to or reduce to a norm or standard
> 2: to make normal (as by a transformation of variables)
> 3: to bring or restore (as relations between countries) to a normal
> condition
> -- nor-mal-iz-able \-,l[0xF5]^--ze-bel\ adj
> -- nor-mal-iza-tion \,no[0xC7]r-me-le-'za^--shen\ n
> -
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-24 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-23 13:33 How did the Spelling Police miss this one? Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-23 14:53 ` Steven Cole
2003-04-23 16:02 ` Herman Oosthuysen
2003-04-23 16:10 ` Steven Cole
2003-04-24 3:39 ` Johannes Ruscheinski
2003-04-24 3:53 ` Miles Bader
2003-04-24 4:16 ` Johannes Ruscheinski
2003-04-24 4:34 ` Miles Bader
2003-04-24 19:08 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-24 23:06 ` Herman Oosthuysen
2003-04-27 11:14 ` Kai Henningsen
2003-04-24 4:26 ` Steven Cole
2003-04-24 14:46 ` Timothy Miller
2003-04-24 15:09 ` viro
2003-04-24 15:44 ` Herman Oosthuysen [this message]
2003-04-24 16:06 ` Timothy Miller
2003-04-24 15:47 ` Steven Cole
2003-04-27 11:09 ` Kai Henningsen
2003-04-24 15:55 ` Timothy Miller
2003-04-24 15:33 ` Herman Oosthuysen
2003-04-24 15:57 ` Timothy Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-24 23:25 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-25 1:39 ` Steven Cole
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3EA8067B.20108@WirelessNetworksInc.com \
--to=herman@wirelessnetworksinc.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.