From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Erik Terpstra Subject: Re: Can ReiserFS solve this? Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 17:52:05 +0200 Message-ID: <3EAD4E25.8030708@solidcode.net> References: <3EAD34D5.8030108@solidcode.net> <3EAD406E.5040108@namesys.com> <3EAD479A.2070606@solidcode.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <3EAD479A.2070606@solidcode.net> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Erik Terpstra wrote: > I just realized that the code in the fuser command could also be done > as a reiser4 plugin (as to provide a more generic solution). > A fuser reiser4 plugin probably implies the following: > > An 'ls' command on an input directory would indeed show only > 'transferred files', which I realize could better be described as > 'files that are in-use by a process'. Duhh, I meant 'transferred files' could better be described as 'files that are *not* in-use by a process. > > > So when such a plugin is active on my home directory and I do an ls I > only see 'complete files'. However when one of my files is opened by a > program, for example bla.doc is opened by OpenOffice, then bla.doc > won't be visible in the results of the 'ls' command (which is kind of > weird behaviour but could be handy at times). > > Is my assumption correct? There is no further distinction between > files that are being received and files that are in use by a process? > > Erik. > >