From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3EB804AB.5090102@inode.at> From: Manfred Gschweidl MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Device Mapper Patches References: <3EB7C6B8.8010506@gmx.at> <20030506144132.GH433@fib011235813.fsnet.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20030506144132.GH433@fib011235813.fsnet.co.uk> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue May 6 13:53:01 2003 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-lvm@sistina.com thank your for the quick response. maybe they are in...;-) keep on the good work (i've lvm running since 2.4.0-rc9 without any failure until now), and i think i will give only LVM2 a try. i do not want to make any bad climate between both sides. ;-) thanks again, manfred Joe Thornber wrote: > On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 04:29:12PM +0200, kihan wrote: > >>hello, >> >>i got a reply, that evms2 and lvm2 will operate on the same >>device-mapper interface, if some patches from the evms team are merged >>into the device-mapper source (for running on 64 bit architectures). >> >>what is the state about this? > > > If they submit them to me and I like them they'll get merged (as they > have been doing for a while). My pending patches directory is empty > ATM, so if I've been lax and overlooked them they'll need to send them > again. > > - Joe > > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@sistina.com > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/ >