From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martijn Lievaart Subject: Re: suggestion, p-o-m, iplimit for ipv6 protocol Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 00:38:25 +0200 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <3EB83961.7070703@rtij.nl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Jozsef Kadlecsik In-Reply-To: Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote: >On Wed, 30 Apr 2003, Martijn Lievaart wrote: > > > >>>A blind porting of the IPv4 conntrack is unacceptable due to the code >>>duplication. >>> >>> >>> >>I understand, but for myself am willing to pay the price of a blind >>port. Has anyone done work in that direction? >> >> > >Brad Chapman made such a port quite some time ago. MARC can help you to >find it. > > > Excuse my ignorance, but what or who is MARC? TIA, Martijn Lievaart