From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 09 May 2003 09:28:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp-out.comcast.net ([IPv6:::ffff:24.153.64.115]:43968 "EHLO smtp-out.comcast.net") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 9 May 2003 09:28:13 +0100 Received: from gentoo.org (pcp02545003pcs.waldrf01.md.comcast.net [68.48.92.102]) by mtaout02.icomcast.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HEM00DMV25H73@mtaout02.icomcast.net> for linux-mips@linux-mips.org; Fri, 09 May 2003 04:27:17 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 04:30:06 -0400 From: Kumba Subject: Re: Problem of cross-mipsel-compiler GLIBC-2.3.X In-reply-to: <001f01c31603$1ed7fbd0$d017a8c0@pc208> To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Reply-to: kumba@gentoo.org Message-id: <3EBB670E.4020200@gentoo.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 References: <3EB0B329.9030603@ict.ac.cn> <16048.55936.346808.522687@cuddles.redhat.com> <3EB0DDC6.5080108@ict.ac.cn> <16048.57054.224964.883062@cuddles.redhat.com> <20030501085018.GA1885@greglaptop.attbi.com> <000a01c315cf$8171ac70$d017a8c0@pc208> <1052464867.2485.3.camel@ghostwheel.sfbay.redhat.com> <3EBB58C6.3070604@gentoo.org> <001f01c31603$1ed7fbd0$d017a8c0@pc208> Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 2318 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: kumba@gentoo.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips I'm not quite sure. I don't see how trying it could hurt, maybe it will work, maybe it won't. Although, 2.14.90.0.1 was just released as well, you might try that, or even CVS Head, as I heard that includes last-minute mips fixes. I'm fairly new to the whole cross-compiler thing myself, and recently discovered the HOWTO mentioned in your previous mail, which I'm looking at to try and get an i686->mips cross-compiler going. For now though, my sparc->mips cross-compiler works, so it's what I'll rely on the most. --Kumba smills_ho wrote: > Dear Kumba, > Should we try this binutils-2.13.90.0.20? > We try the version binutils-2.13.90.0.18 (Debian used) and it is failed on > cross-gcc step :-( > > Thanks and best regards, > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kumba" > To: > Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 3:29 PM > Subject: Re: Problem of cross-mipsel-compiler GLIBC-2.3.X > > > >>Oddly enough, I followed these basic steps and wound up with a working >>cross-compiler from sparc64 -> mipseb (Sun Blade 100 to mips >>big-endian). Gcc nor glibc gave me any issues.....However, when I tried >>the same exact steps on i686, glibc complained about libgcc not being >>available, among other things. It's got me baffled, but I'm not exactly >>complaining. Currently, it's gcc-3.2.3 (propolice patched) + >>glibc-2.3.2 + binutils-2.13.90.0.20, which it'll get rebuilt for the new >>binutils 2.14. >> >>--Kumba >> >> >> >>Eric Christopher wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 2003-05-08 at 19:05, smills_ho wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Dear All, >>>> I want to make a cross-compilered glibc-2.3.x and I get the source > > from > >>>>ftp.gun.org. GCC version is 3.2.3, binutils is 2.13.2.1. The step is as >>>>following: >>>> >>>>1. Try to build binutils >>>>2. Try to make static GCC >>>>3. Try to make glibc -----> Then it is failed >>>> >>>>Is there anybody know what's going on or somebody had successfully to > > build > >>>>the crossed glibc-2.3.x? >>> >>> >>>A host cross host compiler for linux systems is a little more involved >>>than this :) >>> >>>However, I don't know where you went wrong since you really didn't >>>provide much in the way of information as to what you did or where it >>>failed. >>> >>>-eric >>> >> >> > > >