From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Abramo Bagnara Subject: Re: crash trace under gdb Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 19:28:47 +0200 Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <3EBBE54F.8020808@libero.it> References: <20030509153542.E0A9D14CE5@Cantor.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Takashi Iwai Cc: Paul Davis , alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Takashi Iwai ha scritto: > At Fri, 09 May 2003 11:39:42 -0400, > Paul Davis wrote: > >>>how about alt-sysrq-T ? >> >>all this "proves" is that yes, its the lock code because we're running >>in interrupt context, not in process context. >> >>so something in the code jaroslav added is broken, at least for SMP. >> >>i just hope sf.net will let me get my hands on an older copy so i can >>keep working ... > > > you can use the CVS snapshot tarball for the old versions. the > changes for pcm substreams were done from Apr. 28, so Apr. 27 should > be fine for this regard. > or, the CVS repositry backup would be nice to track down the whole > changes, but it's big (13MB). However it would be nice if Paul help us to track down the source of the bug, or give a test case for someone willing to help and with access to SMP hardware. Theoretically the new code should work, I guess there's only a trivial typo. -- Abramo Bagnara mailto:abramo.bagnara@libero.it Opera Unica Phone: +39.546.656023 Via Emilia Interna, 140 48014 Castel Bolognese (RA) - Italy ------------------------------------------------------- Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions www.enterpriselinuxforum.com