All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
To: "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Problem with e100 driver and latency on different packet sizes
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 15:57:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EC3FF1C.7090202@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C6F5CF431189FA4CBAEC9E7DD5441E010107D6D0@orsmsx402.jf.intel.com>

Thanks for the response.

I looked at the code, and there doesn't seem to be a way to turn it off
dynamically or with a bootline option.  I have to have the driver
compiled into the kernel (because I'm netbooting with NFS) so I can't
really use a module parameter.

A dynamic field in /proc would be quite nice.

-Corey

Feldman, Scott wrote:

>>I've attached a small program to measure latency of 
>>round-trip time on UDP.  If I send 85-byte packets between 
>>two of my machines, I get 170us round-trip latency.  If I 
>>send 86-byte packets, I get 1329us latency. 
>>This seems quite odd.  If I test on the eepro100 driver, I 
>>get expected linear increase in round-trip time as the packet 
>>size increases, and it never gets close to 1300us.
>>    
>>
>
>This sounds like a side-effect of the "CPU Cycle Saver" feature to
>bundle Rx packets per one interrupt.  See
>Documentation/networking/e100.txt.  I haven't tried your setup, but I
>would guess that you can play around with the BundleSmallFr module
>parameter, or better yet, if you want the lowest latencies, turn off CPU
>Saver (ucode=0).
>
>CPU Saver trades latency for reduced interrupts, resulting in CPU
>savings, hence the name.
>
>Hope this helps.
>
>-scott
>
>
>  
>



  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-15 20:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-15 17:12 Problem with e100 driver and latency on different packet sizes Feldman, Scott
2003-05-15 20:57 ` Corey Minyard [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-15 14:54 Corey Minyard
2003-05-15 17:31 ` Jonathan Brown
2003-05-15 20:11   ` Mark Haverkamp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3EC3FF1C.7090202@mvista.com \
    --to=cminyard@mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=scott.feldman@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.