From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.kernel.2003@gmx.net>
To: alexander.riesen@synopsys.COM
Cc: mikpe@csd.uu.se, sfr@canb.auug.org.au,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-laptop@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.69+bk: oops in apmd after waking up from suspend mode
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 12:39:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ECA05FA.6090008@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030519144130.GM32559@Synopsys.COM>
Alex Riesen wrote:
> Alex Riesen, Mon, May 19, 2003 14:31:19 +0200:
>
>>>>EIP is at fix_processor_context+0x5f/0x100
>>>>Process kapmd (pid: 4, threadinfo=c5f0e000 task=c5fbc640)
>>>
>>>After receiving Alex' .config and gcc version (3.2.3), I've been
>>>able to decipher this. current->mm is NULL in the kapmd task. The call
>>>
>>> load_LDT(¤t->mm->context); /* This does lldt */
>>>
>>>in fix_processor_context() computes the address of context as
>>>(current->mm)+0x7c, which is 0x7c. load_LDT_nolock() dereferences
>>>0x7c+0x14 (void *segments = pc->ldt) and the oops follows.
>>>
>>>As to _why_ kapmd's current->mm is NULL, I don't know. It isn't
>>>when I test APM suspend in 2.5.69-bk. A lot of code dereferences
>>>current->mm without checking, so I guess current->mm==NULL is a bug.
>>
>>i just go and try it with the latest -bk.
>
> no change. Still oopses.
Could you try to compile with gcc-3.3? In another thread (2.5.69-mm6:
pccard oops) this helped IIRC. I'm suspecting gcc 3.2.3 generates
incorrect code for some cases.
Regards,
Carl-Daniel
--
http://www.hailfinger.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-20 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-19 12:16 2.5.69+bk: oops in apmd after waking up from suspend mode mikpe
2003-05-19 12:31 ` Alex Riesen
2003-05-19 14:41 ` Alex Riesen
2003-05-19 15:13 ` Alex Riesen
2003-05-20 10:39 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [this message]
2003-05-20 10:48 ` Alex Riesen
2003-05-20 16:34 ` Milton Miller
2003-05-20 17:00 ` Alex Riesen
2003-05-20 17:17 ` Alex Riesen
2003-05-20 20:10 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-05-20 22:01 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-05-22 17:01 ` bill davidsen
2003-05-19 21:57 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-05-19 21:57 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-14 9:48 Alex Riesen
2003-05-14 13:04 ` mikpe
2003-05-14 13:46 ` Alex Riesen
2003-05-14 14:03 ` mikpe
2003-05-14 14:11 ` Alex Riesen
2003-05-14 14:37 ` mikpe
2003-05-14 14:45 ` Alex Riesen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3ECA05FA.6090008@gmx.net \
--to=c-d.hailfinger.kernel.2003@gmx.net \
--cc=alexander.riesen@synopsys.COM \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-laptop@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikpe@csd.uu.se \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.