From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Courtier-Dutton Subject: Re: Removal of /proc/asound ? Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 12:37:00 +0100 Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <3ECA135C.6030000@superbug.demon.co.uk> References: <20030517081625.6ef24458.erikd-alsa@mega-nerd.com> <20030518081331.7b9eca31.erikd-alsa@mega-nerd.com> <20030519200301.1c3276f7.erikd-alsa@mega-nerd.com> <20030520044030.GD24175@vergenet.net> <20030520010904.4a389604.david@eelf.ddts.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20030520010904.4a389604.david@eelf.ddts.net> Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: David B Harris Cc: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org David B Harris wrote: > On Tue, 20 May 2003 14:40:30 +1000 > Conrad Parker wrote: > >>On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 08:03:01PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: >> >>>I therefore strongly urge you to keep 2.4 functionality as it was and feel >>>free to do whatever is needed for the 2.5/2.6 kernel. >> >>erik, you're hassling the wrong people -- a script exists to make the >>devices you want, this is a packaging problem for el Debian ALSA Psychos >>(knowing that erik uses debian), and a bog-standard GOTCHA for CVS users, >>unless it can be done by make install or something. > > > One of the Debian ALSA maintainers here. > > The removal of /proc/asound/dev/ has been noted, and shouldn't be a > problem :) Once we actually upload packages within which > /proc/asound/dev/ has been removed, anyways. We haven't yet. I doubt > erik is bitching because of this, he hasn't asked any of us about it. I am running Debian with kernel.org kernel 2.4.20 and devfs. Why does anyone have to wait until kernel 2.5 for devfs. Cheers James ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore. If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge