From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: reiserfs vs NTFS vs WAFL
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 21:22:23 +0400
Message-ID: <3ECD074F.8040009@namesys.com>
References: <3ECBC1DF.3060607@namesys.com> <003b01c32070$052d59b0$0101a8c0@bummer> <20030522170723.GH7706@vestdata.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-14210-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <20030522170723.GH7706@vestdata.no>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Ragnar_Kj=F8rstad?= <reiserfs@ragnark.vestdata.no>
Cc: darren <teodarren@myrealbox.com>, 'reiserfs' <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>, 'Mike Jadon' <mikej@umem.com>

Ragnar Kj=F8rstad wrote:

>
>Alternatively SPEC sfs is probably a good way to test NFS-performance
>(but it costs $$).
>
I am told it is free now.


--=20
Hans