From: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose@wanadoo.es>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [announce] procps 2.0.13 with NPTL enhancements
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 20:59:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ED7AA0F.6090308@wanadoo.es> (raw)
Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
>>You finally fixed a SEGV that I fixed well
>>over a year ago. Congradulations. You have
>>others to fix, and a minor (?) security
>>issue as well. Have fun.
>
> Again, you know there is a problem but you
> don't say anything about it.
> You do not want to fix it, don't you ?
> This is fine with me (even if it is hard to
> understand the reason), but you are just
> /wrong/ when you know about a problem and
> don't provide information about it.
> Again, this is just my opinion...
the root of the problem is that not all
packages maintainers of distributions send feedback/fixes
to _origianl software writer_. And you have cases
like this. Diferents tastes from same software,
everyone with its bugs and features.
Without to go too far, there are a lot of stupid
fixes into distributions kernels not present in 2.4.21-rcX
This is a general problem, and IMHO the distributions maintainers
should send more feedback to package maintainer more frequently.
-thanks-
regards,
--
Software is like sex, it's better when it's bug free.
next reply other threads:[~2003-05-30 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-30 18:59 Xose Vazquez Perez [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-31 2:36 [announce] procps 2.0.13 with NPTL enhancements Xose Vazquez Perez
2003-05-30 8:12 Paolo Ciarrocchi
2003-05-30 8:20 ` cosmos
[not found] <1054270854.22088.617.camel@cube>
2003-05-30 6:26 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-06-01 4:53 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-05-30 16:56 ` Xose Vazquez Perez
[not found] ` <3ED788B5.2080203@wanadoo.es>
2003-05-31 1:25 ` Albert Cahalan
2003-05-30 5:30 Albert Cahalan
2003-05-29 17:25 Xose Vazquez Perez
2003-05-29 18:08 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-05-29 11:16 ` Robert Love
2003-05-29 20:01 ` Vincent Hanquez
2003-05-29 15:40 ` Robert Love
2003-05-28 15:09 Robert Love
2003-05-28 23:19 ` Phil Oester
2003-05-28 16:22 ` Robert Love
2003-05-28 23:59 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3ED7AA0F.6090308@wanadoo.es \
--to=xose@wanadoo.es \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.