From: Andreas Haumer <andreas@xss.co.at>
To: george anzinger <george@mvista.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: system clock speed too high?
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 12:04:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EDC72B3.9040109@xss.co.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EDBB4B0.6070601@mvista.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
george anzinger wrote:
> Andreas Haumer wrote:
>
[...]
>> I have a quite strange phenomenon here: I see a ~2.5 times
>> speed up of system time on a Asus AP1700-S5 server with
>> Linux-2.4.21-rc6-ac1.
>> Simple proof: a "sleep 300" command terminates after exactly
>> 120 seconds of wall clock time.
>
>
> Just as a wild shot in the dark, what speed does the kernel think the
> cpu is running at and does this match what the BIOS thinks?
>
> It sounds like the CLOCK_TICK_RATE is wrong. This would show up as the
> kernel thinking the cpu was fast also.
>
Hm, I don't think this is the case.
BIOS reports (correctly) a single, hyperthreaded Xeon CPU
with 2.4GHz
Kernel reports the same:
root@setup:~ {503} $ uname -a
Linux setup 2.4.21-rc6-ac1 #2 SMP Tue Jun 3 09:45:13 CEST 2003 i686 unknown
root@setup:~ {504} $ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 2
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 2392.065
cache size : 512 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 2
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
bogomips : 4771.02
processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model : 2
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 2392.065
cache size : 512 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 2
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 2
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm
bogomips : 4771.02
root@setup:~ {505} $ ntpdate ntp.xss.co.at; sleep 500; ntpdate ntp.xss.co.at
3 Jun 11:58:16 ntpdate[1118]: step time server 194.152.162.17 offset -177.268071 sec
3 Jun 12:01:36 ntpdate[1120]: step time server 194.152.162.17 offset -300.106769 sec
(Sleeping 500 "system seconds" takes 200 "wall clock seconds")
> You pin this to a particular kernel version. Do other kernel versions
> do a better job?
>
So far I tried with:
2.4.21-rc2-ac2 (ACPI compiled as module)
2.4.21-rc4 (ACPI compiled as module)
2.4.21-rc6-ac1 (ACPI compiled as module)
2.4.21-rc6-ac1 (no ACPI comiled at all)
Time acceleration is the same for all kernels.
I'll try it with some older kernels, too.
- - andreas
- --
Andreas Haumer | mailto:andreas@xss.co.at
*x Software + Systeme | http://www.xss.co.at/
Karmarschgasse 51/2/20 | Tel: +43-1-6060114-0
A-1100 Vienna, Austria | Fax: +43-1-6060114-71
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE+3HKxxJmyeGcXPhERAkZ/AJ9tjgI6K2HtM/tL15nKDFIKzdcvQgCfYOGY
i96/o6Nyxlem5yOp1A2Q//s=
=plFh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-03 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-02 19:40 system clock speed too high? Andreas Haumer
2003-06-02 19:36 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-03 9:54 ` Andreas Haumer
2003-06-03 12:00 ` Andreas Haumer
2003-06-03 12:17 ` Zephaniah E. Hull
2003-06-03 12:39 ` Andreas Haumer
2003-06-03 13:00 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-03 14:23 ` Andreas Haumer
2003-06-03 14:49 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-06-03 15:31 ` Andreas Haumer
2003-06-04 5:44 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-06-04 8:49 ` Andreas Haumer
2003-06-03 15:17 ` venom
2003-06-03 15:38 ` Andreas Haumer
2003-06-03 15:43 ` venom
2003-06-03 15:47 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-06-03 16:12 ` venom
2003-06-02 20:33 ` george anzinger
2003-06-03 10:04 ` Andreas Haumer [this message]
2003-06-03 19:12 ` system clock speed too high? hyperthread problem? george anzinger
2003-06-04 9:47 ` system clock speed too high? Herbert Xu
2003-06-04 13:02 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3EDC72B3.9040109@xss.co.at \
--to=andreas@xss.co.at \
--cc=george@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.