From: P@draigBrady.com
To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: performance
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 17:16:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EE4B2E3.2070700@draigBrady.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EE4B1EB.9090305@draigBrady.com>
P@draigBrady.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm testing netfilter performance here on
> PIII 1.2GHz based systems. With default
> kernel configuration, netfilter is able
> to process 85,000 pps with 125 rules (all
> rules matching).
>
> Note the application is just counting.
> There is no transmitting/forwarding.
>
> Also note the nics are e100.
>
> So my simple question are there any
> tips in increasing the performance?
> Hmm actually the performance seems
> optimal? is it only taking 9 instructions
> per match? 1.2*10^9/(85000*1500) = 9
I knew that couldn't be right.
That was tested on a dual 1.2GHz,
so that should be approx:
2*10^9/(85000*125) = 188 instructions per match.
I guess that's pretty optimal?
The best I could hope for after that
would be to increase the rx packet
buffer space so as to handle higher
spikes than this.
cheers,
Pádraig.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-09 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-09 16:12 performance P
2003-06-09 16:16 ` P [this message]
2003-06-09 18:27 ` Re[2]: performance Peteris Krumins
2003-06-10 8:49 ` performance P
2003-06-11 12:16 ` performance Harald Welte
2003-06-12 12:04 ` performance P
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-07 16:36 Performance erik.teose
2003-03-07 7:48 Performance Aman
2002-08-02 6:55 Max IO size Mukul Kotwani
2002-08-02 7:50 ` Performance Mukul Kotwani
2002-08-02 9:16 ` Performance Fabien Salvi
2002-08-02 14:16 ` Performance Craig Tierney
2002-08-02 23:01 ` Performance Mukul Kotwani
2002-08-02 23:06 ` Performance Randy.Dunlap
2002-08-03 8:26 ` Performance Mukul Kotwani
2002-08-03 16:34 ` Performance Randy.Dunlap
2002-08-03 18:16 ` Performance Simon Trimmer
2002-08-03 20:03 ` Performance Mukul Kotwani
2002-08-04 6:27 ` Performance Jeremy Higdon
2002-08-04 7:39 ` Performance Mukul Kotwani
2002-08-04 8:01 ` Performance Jeremy Higdon
2002-04-22 15:15 Performance Gregor Pavlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3EE4B2E3.2070700@draigBrady.com \
--to=p@draigbrady.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.