All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Peloquin <peloquin@austin.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linstab <linstab@osdl.org>,
	ltp-results <ltp-results@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: BENCHMARK] 2.5.72, 2.5.72-mm1, 2.5.71, 2.5.71-bk1, 2.5.71-mjb1
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 21:07:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EF11ACF.4040503@austin.ibm.com> (raw)



Nightly Regression Summary
for
2.5.72 vs 2.5.72-mm1


Benchmark         Pass/Fail   Improvements   Regressions       Results       Results   Summary
---------------   ---------   ------------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -------

dbench.ext2           P            N              N             2.5.72    2.5.72-mm1    report
dbench.ext3           P            Y              N             2.5.72    2.5.72-mm1    report
dbench.jfs            P            N              N             2.5.72    2.5.72-mm1    report
dbench.reiser         P            Y              N             2.5.72    2.5.72-mm1    report
dbench.xfs            P            N              N             2.5.72    2.5.72-mm1    report
kernbench             P            N              N             2.5.72    2.5.72-mm1    report
lmbench               P            Y              Y             2.5.72    2.5.72-mm1    report
rawiobench            P            Y              Y             2.5.72    2.5.72-mm1    report
specjbb               P            Y              Y             2.5.72    2.5.72-mm1    report
specsdet              P            N              Y             2.5.72    2.5.72-mm1    report
tbench                P            Y              N             2.5.72    2.5.72-mm1    report
tiobench.ext2         P            Y              Y             2.5.72    2.5.72-mm1    report
tiobench.ext3         P            Y              Y             2.5.72    2.5.72-mm1    report
tiobench.jfs          P            Y              N             2.5.72    2.5.72-mm1    report
tiobench.reiser       P            Y              Y             2.5.72    2.5.72-mm1    report
tiobench.xfs          P            Y              Y             2.5.72    2.5.72-mm1    report
volanomark            P            N              N             2.5.72    2.5.72-mm1    report

http://ltcperf.ncsa.uiuc.edu/data/2.5.72-mm1/2.5.72-vs-2.5.72-mm1/

Nightly Regression Summary
for
2.5.71 vs 2.5.72


Benchmark         Pass/Fail   Improvements   Regressions       Results       Results   Summary
---------------   ---------   ------------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -------

dbench.ext2           P            N              N             2.5.71        2.5.72    report
dbench.ext3           P            N              Y             2.5.71        2.5.72    report
dbench.jfs            P            N              N             2.5.71        2.5.72    report
dbench.reiser         P            N              N             2.5.71        2.5.72    report
dbench.xfs            P            N              N             2.5.71        2.5.72    report
kernbench             P            N              N             2.5.71        2.5.72    report
lmbench               P            Y              Y             2.5.71        2.5.72    report
rawiobench            P            Y              N             2.5.71        2.5.72    report
specjbb               P            Y              Y             2.5.71        2.5.72    report
specsdet              P            N              N             2.5.71        2.5.72    report
tbench                P            Y              Y             2.5.71        2.5.72    report
tiobench.ext2         P            N              N             2.5.71        2.5.72    report
tiobench.ext3         P            Y              N             2.5.71        2.5.72    report
tiobench.jfs          P            N              N             2.5.71        2.5.72    report
tiobench.reiser       P            Y              Y             2.5.71        2.5.72    report
tiobench.xfs          P            N              N             2.5.71        2.5.72    report
volanomark            P            N              N             2.5.71        2.5.72    report

http://ltcperf.ncsa.uiuc.edu/data/2.5.71/2.5.70-vs-2.5.71/

Nightly Regression Summary
for
2.5.70 vs 2.5.72


Benchmark         Pass/Fail   Improvements   Regressions       Results       Results   Summary
---------------   ---------   ------------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -------

dbench.ext2           P            Y              N             2.5.70        2.5.72    report
dbench.ext3           P            N              Y             2.5.70        2.5.72    report
dbench.jfs            P            N              N             2.5.70        2.5.72    report
dbench.reiser         P            N              N             2.5.70        2.5.72    report
dbench.xfs            P            N              N             2.5.70        2.5.72    report
kernbench             P            N              N             2.5.70        2.5.72    report
lmbench               P            Y              Y             2.5.70        2.5.72    report
rawiobench            P            Y              N             2.5.70        2.5.72    report
specjbb               P            Y              N             2.5.70        2.5.72    report
specsdet              P            N              N             2.5.70        2.5.72    report
tbench                P            Y              Y             2.5.70        2.5.72    report
tiobench.ext2         P            N              N             2.5.70        2.5.72    report
tiobench.ext3         P            Y              Y             2.5.70        2.5.72    report
tiobench.jfs          P            N              Y             2.5.70        2.5.72    report
tiobench.reiser       P            Y              Y             2.5.70        2.5.72    report
tiobench.xfs          P            Y              N             2.5.70        2.5.72    report
volanomark            P            N              N             2.5.70        2.5.72    report

http://ltcperf.ncsa.uiuc.edu/data/2.5.72/2.5.70-vs-2.5.72/

Nightly Regression Summary
for
2.5.71 vs 2.5.71-bk1


Benchmark         Pass/Fail   Improvements   Regressions       Results       Results   Summary
---------------   ---------   ------------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -------

dbench.ext2           P            N              N             2.5.71    2.5.71-bk1    report
dbench.ext3           P            N              Y             2.5.71    2.5.71-bk1    report
dbench.jfs            P            N              N             2.5.71    2.5.71-bk1    report
dbench.reiser         P            N              N             2.5.71    2.5.71-bk1    report
dbench.xfs            P            Y              N             2.5.71    2.5.71-bk1    report
kernbench             P            N              N             2.5.71    2.5.71-bk1    report
lmbench               P            Y              Y             2.5.71    2.5.71-bk1    report
rawiobench            P            N              N             2.5.71    2.5.71-bk1    report
specjbb               P            Y              Y             2.5.71    2.5.71-bk1    report
specsdet              P            N              N             2.5.71    2.5.71-bk1    report
tbench                P            Y              Y             2.5.71    2.5.71-bk1    report
tiobench.ext2         P            N              N             2.5.71    2.5.71-bk1    report
tiobench.ext3         P            Y              N             2.5.71    2.5.71-bk1    report
tiobench.jfs          P            N              N             2.5.71    2.5.71-bk1    report
tiobench.reiser       P            Y              Y             2.5.71    2.5.71-bk1    report
tiobench.xfs          P            Y              N             2.5.71    2.5.71-bk1    report
volanomark            P            N              N             2.5.71    2.5.71-bk1    report

http://ltcperf.ncsa.uiuc.edu/data/2.5.71-bk1/2.5.71-vs-2.5.71-bk1/

Nightly Regression Summary
for
2.5.71 vs 2.5.71-mjb1


Benchmark         Pass/Fail   Improvements   Regressions       Results       Results   Summary
---------------   ---------   ------------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -------

dbench.ext2           P            N              Y             2.5.71   2.5.71-mjb1    report
dbench.ext3           P            N              Y             2.5.71   2.5.71-mjb1    report
dbench.jfs            P            N              N             2.5.71   2.5.71-mjb1    report
dbench.reiser         P            Y              N             2.5.71   2.5.71-mjb1    report
dbench.xfs            P            N              N             2.5.71   2.5.71-mjb1    report
kernbench             P            N              N             2.5.71   2.5.71-mjb1    report
lmbench               P            Y              Y             2.5.71   2.5.71-mjb1    report
rawiobench            P            Y              Y             2.5.71   2.5.71-mjb1    report
specjbb               P            Y              Y             2.5.71   2.5.71-mjb1    report
specsdet              P            N              N             2.5.71   2.5.71-mjb1    report
tbench                P            Y              N             2.5.71   2.5.71-mjb1    report
tiobench.ext2         P            Y              Y             2.5.71   2.5.71-mjb1    report
tiobench.ext3         P            Y              Y             2.5.71   2.5.71-mjb1    report
tiobench.jfs          P            N              Y             2.5.71   2.5.71-mjb1    report
tiobench.reiser       P            Y              Y             2.5.71   2.5.71-mjb1    report
tiobench.xfs          P            Y              Y             2.5.71   2.5.71-mjb1    report
volanomark            P            N              N             2.5.71   2.5.71-mjb1    report

http://ltcperf.ncsa.uiuc.edu/data/2.5.71-mjb1/2.5.71-vs-2.5.71-mjb1/

Mark




                 reply	other threads:[~2003-06-19  1:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3EF11ACF.4040503@austin.ibm.com \
    --to=peloquin@austin.ibm.com \
    --cc=linstab@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltp-results@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.