From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John Dalbec <jpdalbec@ysu.edu>
Subject: Re: Recent spam
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 15:08:36 -0400
Message-ID: <3EF35BB4.8070401@ysu.edu>
References: <3EDAEEBE.3050202@netscape.net> <20030606170931.A19366@t-raenon.nmd.msu.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-14645-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: flx@msu.ru
Cc: Manuel Krause <manuelkrause@netscape.net>, reiserfs-list <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

Alexander Lyamin wrote:
> Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 08:29:18AM +0200, Manuel Krause wrote:
> 
>>Hi!
>>
>>Whats up with these rows of spam mails I receive from reiserfs list the 
>>last days/weeks? Does this list spam itself now or what new anti-spam 
>>algorithm did I miss?
>>
> 
> 
> Its my fault.
> I never recognised that Spamassassin changed format for  "X-Spam-Flag" field,
> 
> its seems like I fixed it now.
> 
> 

BTW it really shouldn't matter to your processing what the X-Spam-Flag 
header says ("Yes" or "YES" or "kltpzyxm").  If it's present at all the 
message is spam and should be treated as such.
John