From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Kujau Subject: Re: vpf-10680, minor corruptions Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 02:42:24 +0200 Message-ID: <3EF8EFF0.6020207@g-house.de> References: <3EF07AFB.8060303@g-house.de> <20030618152626.GA17240@namesys.com> <3EF0A8E8.2000209@g-house.de> <20030619054535.GA23852@namesys.com> <3EF6AE67.5090502@namesys.com> <20030623090258.GA12259@namesys.com> <3EF6C83F.6060702@namesys.com> <3EF702CC.9050005@g-house.de> <20030624131904.GA460@namesys.com> <3EF86928.7080504@g-house.de> <20030624151940.GC21845@namesys.com> <3EF888B2.4000900@g-house.de> Reply-To: evil@g-house.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <3EF888B2.4000900@g-house.de> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: ReiserFS List Christian Kujau schrieb: > of course, the best thing i can do is the el-cheapo-hacking approach: > compiling 2.5.60...up to 2.5.72 and see *when* it breaks. hm, compiling > a 2.5 kernel takes 180min on this machine. but anyway, i'll start with > 2.5.60 now, see what it gives. no, i started with 2.5.66 but the kernel did not compile. 2.5.65 did compile (don't ask how long....) and has already booted. but trying to mount the newly created reiserfs gives: module reiserfs: Relocation overflow vs section 9 in the log. the reiserfs module was not loaded. "modprobe reiserfs" gives: lila:~# modprobe reiserfs FATAL: Error inserting reiserfs (/lib/modules/2.5.65/kernel/fs/reiserfs/reiserfs.ko): Invalid module format lila:~# uname -a Linux lila 2.5.65 #4 Wed Jun 25 00:48:46 CEST 2003 alpha GNU/Linux i compiled the module with CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK=y. shall i go on with 2.5.64 or better 2.5.67 ? good night, Christian.