From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christian Kujau <evil@g-house.de>
Subject: Re: vpf-10680, minor corruptions
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 18:33:21 +0200
Message-ID: <3EFC71D1.1040104@g-house.de>
References: <20030625054031.GA11576@namesys.com> <3EF9A0F6.4030401@g-house.de> <3EF9E939.1050501@g-house.de> <20030626092608.GA12252@namesys.com> <3EFAE933.6040206@g-house.de> <20030627092821.GA29715@namesys.com> <3EFC361A.4030009@g-house.de> <20030627122556.GA8753@namesys.com> <3EFC396A.7080808@g-house.de> <20030627123800.GA9214@namesys.com> <20030627161344.GA13908@namesys.com>
Reply-To: evil@g-house.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-14742-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <20030627161344.GA13908@namesys.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: ReiserFS List <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

Oleg Drokin schrieb:
> I have traced the new problem to a cross compiler that compiles
> code in a different way than native compiler for whatever reason
> (demo is attached as test.c program, it should print "result is 1"

yes, that what it prints, no warnings were shown.

> You might try that patch as well to see if it helps you before I try it ;)

yes, compiling with _this_ patch but _not_ with the last patch you sent 
(file.c) is under way again...


Thank you,
Christian.