From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Mabry Subject: Re: Athlon Mobile Support Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 00:49:40 -0700 Sender: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <3F028E94.8020008@student.gc.maricopa.edu> References: <3F028919.8060402@student.gc.maricopa.edu> <3F0289AA.6090208@searchbroker.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Errors-To: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: cpufreq Lars Gemeinhardt wrote: > one question - same answer! Oops sorry. Thought the answer I was looking for would be different than your previous. I'll try it out and report on how things went. Reading more about cpufreq it sounds like this does not provide voltage regulation? I'm using cpufreq in the hopes to greatly increase my battery life. Should I expect this as a result? Thanks. -- Slackware Linux - Find out about the 4S rule. www.slackware-advocacy.org/whyuse.html Then try it out for yourself. www.slackware.org