From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lars Gemeinhardt <lars.gemeinhardt@searchbroker.de>
Subject: Re: Athlon Mobile Support
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 09:55:40 +0200
Sender: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk
Message-ID: <3F028FFC.8000204@searchbroker.de>
References: <3F028919.8060402@student.gc.maricopa.edu> <3F0289AA.6090208@searchbroker.de> <3F028E94.8020008@student.gc.maricopa.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <3F028E94.8020008@student.gc.maricopa.edu>
Errors-To: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <cpufreq.vger.kernel.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk>
List-Help: <mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/private/cpufreq/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
Cc: James Mabry <jamabryl@student.gc.maricopa.edu>

James Mabry wrote:

> Lars Gemeinhardt wrote:
>
>> one question - same answer!
>
>
> Oops sorry. Thought the answer I was looking for would be different 
> than your previous. I'll try it out and report on how things went.
>
> Reading more about cpufreq it sounds like this does not provide 
> voltage regulation? I'm using cpufreq in the hopes to greatly increase 
> my battery life. Should I expect this as a result? Thanks. 

normaly (if your PST table is correct) both FIDs and VIDs should be 
regulated - but Sony and Acer PST tables (hold in the BIOS) are not 
correct ... maybe we can fix this :-) I send therefor a Call4Responce ...