From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cpout2.tiscali.be (cpout2.tiscali.be [62.235.13.194]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922B9482D for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:30:32 -0600 (MDT) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 19:30:29 +0200 Message-ID: <3F0C24F800000FDD@ocpmta8.freegates.net> In-Reply-To: <1058212036.2966.13.camel@mulgrave> From: "Joel Soete" Subject: RE: [parisc-linux] [PATCH] fix arbitrary limits on stack size To: "James Bottomley" Cc: parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > >On Mon, 2003-07-14 at 05:48, Joel Soete wrote: > I don' t remember the historical reason of this choice but do you think it > is possible to back-port it into 2.4 (it will facilitate so much the merge > with upstream?) >Well, I suppose, theoretically. > However, before we consider backporting, what I really need is for > people to test it. Ok Jame, Now I have a 32bits 2.6.0-test1-pa1 running so I come back to you. No problem to apply it :) , so I can launch the compile. Just a question in the mean time: it doesn't seens that your patch take care of CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP in related files? Thanks, Joel ------------------------------------------------------ Soldes Tiscali ADSL : 27,50 euros/mois jusque fin 2003. On s'habitue vite à payer son ADSL moins cher! Plus d'info? Cliquez ici... http://reg.tiscali.be/default.asp?lg=fr