All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: Fix IDE initialization when we don't probe for interrupts.
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 18:08:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F0C9251.2010107@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200307092110.h69LAlgG027527@hera.kernel.org>

Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> ChangeSet 1.1374, 2003/07/09 13:40:53-07:00, torvalds@home.osdl.org
> 
> 	Fix IDE initialization when we don't probe for interrupts.
> 	
> 	The driver obviously cannot rely on the interrupt handler
> 	when it is probing for interrupts, so the identify code is
> 	written to not use interrupts and the probing code will
> 	disable the interrupt after having figured out which one it
> 	is.
> 	
> 	The non-probe code should do the same, otherwise confusion
> 	happens. 

> diff -Nru a/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c b/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c
> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c	Wed Jul  9 14:10:54 2003
> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-probe.c	Wed Jul  9 14:10:54 2003
> @@ -390,6 +390,14 @@
>  		cookie = probe_irq_on();
>  		/* enable device irq */
>  		hwif->OUTB(drive->ctl, IDE_CONTROL_REG);
> +	} else {
> +		/*
> +		 * Disable device irq if we don't need to
> +		 * probe for it. Otherwise we'll get spurious
> +		 * interrupts during the identify-phase that
> +		 * the irq handler isn't expecting.
> +		 */
> +		hwif->OUTB(drive->ctl|2, IDE_CONTROL_REG);


Yeah, my driver does probing with interrupts disabled, too.

I'm curious where interrupts are re-enabled, though?

	Jeff




       reply	other threads:[~2003-07-09 21:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200307092110.h69LAlgG027527@hera.kernel.org>
2003-07-09 22:08 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2003-07-09 22:25   ` Fix IDE initialization when we don't probe for interrupts Linus Torvalds
2003-07-09 22:51     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-07-09 22:52     ` Jeff Garzik
2003-07-17 15:36     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-07-09 23:28   ` Alan Cox
2003-07-17 15:32     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-07-17 15:58 John Bradford
2003-07-17 15:52 ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3F0C9251.2010107@pobox.com \
    --to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.