From: Danny Smith <dannys@cinesite.co.uk>
To: nfs <nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Iain Irwin-Powell <Iain@cinesite.co.uk>
Subject: NFSERR_EAGAIN
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 19:29:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F0DB088.303@cinesite.co.uk> (raw)
I've been trying to resolve some issues we have with a set of systems
running 2.4.20+NFS_ALL, dual CPU and Gigabit Ethernet. They're talking
to SGI IRIX servers, (6.5.19), and having intermittent problems - this
can be seen sometimes where an NFS mounted directory will "disappear",
but subsequently be accessible. No errors are returned to the shell -
the directory just appears to have no entries.
This seems (although I don't have proof positive yet, more testing is in
progrees) to coincide with errors in the logs:
Jul 9 14:18:09 trout-node13 kernel: nfs_stat_to_errno: bad nfs status
return value: 11
Looking through nfs2xdr.c and nfs.h and googling, it seems that error
number 11 is not properly defined, but certainly seems to be in use by
SGI. From nfs2xdr.c:
{ NFSERR_NXIO, ENXIO },
/* { NFSERR_EAGAIN, EAGAIN }, */
{ NFSERR_ACCES, EACCES },
(EAGAIN having value 11)
Does anyone know much about the history of this? Was this removed in
order to be RFC compliant, or is there a stronger motivation not to have
this?
It would maybe explain what I'm seeing if SGI are interpreting error 11
as "Try again" - this mainly happens when server load is high.
Any insight into this would be welcome - meanwhile I'm going to try some
tests with NFSERR_EGAIN put back in.
Danny
--
Danny Smith
Senior Systems Administrator, Cinesite (Europe) Ltd
020 7973 4000 - x4055 / dannys@cinesite.co.uk
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more.
Download & eval WebKing and get a free book.
www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next reply other threads:[~2003-07-10 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-10 18:29 Danny Smith [this message]
2003-07-10 22:41 ` NFSERR_EAGAIN Trond Myklebust
2003-07-11 9:55 ` NFSERR_EAGAIN Danny Smith
2003-07-11 10:13 ` NFSERR_EAGAIN Trond Myklebust
2003-07-16 15:53 ` NFSERR_EAGAIN - resolved Danny Smith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F0DB088.303@cinesite.co.uk \
--to=dannys@cinesite.co.uk \
--cc=Iain@cinesite.co.uk \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.