All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Danny Smith <dannys@cinesite.co.uk>
To: nfs <nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Iain Irwin-Powell <Iain@cinesite.co.uk>
Subject: NFSERR_EAGAIN
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 19:29:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F0DB088.303@cinesite.co.uk> (raw)

I've been trying to resolve some issues we have with a set of systems 
running 2.4.20+NFS_ALL, dual CPU and Gigabit Ethernet. They're talking 
to SGI IRIX servers, (6.5.19), and having intermittent problems - this 
can be seen sometimes where an NFS mounted directory will "disappear", 
but subsequently be accessible. No errors are returned to the shell - 
the directory just appears to have no entries.

This seems (although I don't have proof positive yet, more testing is in 
progrees) to coincide with errors in the logs:

Jul  9 14:18:09 trout-node13 kernel: nfs_stat_to_errno: bad nfs status 
return value: 11

Looking through nfs2xdr.c and nfs.h and googling, it seems that error 
number 11 is not properly defined, but certainly seems to be in use by 
SGI. From nfs2xdr.c:
 
      { NFSERR_NXIO,         ENXIO         },
/*    { NFSERR_EAGAIN,       EAGAIN        }, */
      { NFSERR_ACCES,        EACCES        },

(EAGAIN having value 11)

Does anyone know much about the history of this? Was this removed in 
order to be RFC compliant, or is there a stronger motivation not to have 
this?

It would maybe explain what I'm seeing if SGI are interpreting error 11 
as "Try again" - this mainly happens when server load is high.

Any insight into this would be welcome - meanwhile I'm going to try some 
tests with NFSERR_EGAIN put back in.

Danny

-- 
Danny Smith
Senior Systems Administrator, Cinesite (Europe) Ltd
020 7973 4000 - x4055    /    dannys@cinesite.co.uk




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more.
Download & eval WebKing and get a free book.
www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

             reply	other threads:[~2003-07-10 18:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-10 18:29 Danny Smith [this message]
2003-07-10 22:41 ` NFSERR_EAGAIN Trond Myklebust
2003-07-11  9:55   ` NFSERR_EAGAIN Danny Smith
2003-07-11 10:13     ` NFSERR_EAGAIN Trond Myklebust
2003-07-16 15:53 ` NFSERR_EAGAIN - resolved Danny Smith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3F0DB088.303@cinesite.co.uk \
    --to=dannys@cinesite.co.uk \
    --cc=Iain@cinesite.co.uk \
    --cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.