From: Samuel Flory <sflory@rackable.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
Cc: Chad Kitching <CKitching@powerlandcomputers.com>,
Steven Dake <sdake@mvista.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andre@linux-ide.org
Subject: Re: IDE/Promise 20276 FastTrack RAID Doesn't work in 2.4.21, patchattached to fix
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 16:04:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F0DF118.3080806@rackable.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.30.0307110011320.6781-100000@mion.elka.pw.edu.pl>
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Chad Kitching wrote:
>
>
>
>>I don't know. That seemed to have changed the option from merely
>>mystifying to down right confusing. By that wording, does that feature
>>override it into being a plain IDE controller, or an IDE RAID controller?
>>The new name seems to imply the former, while the mentions
>>of ataraid suggest the latter.
>>
>>
>
>Hmmm... you are right. Comment is still misleading in respect to RAID.
>
>ataraid driver is a _software_ RAID, just like Promise's binary driver.
>
>FastTracks have software RAID. There are few true hardware FastTrak
>RAID controllers with I2O interface but we probe for them properly in
>pdc202xx_new.c driver and don't use IDE driver for them.
>
>
>
>>Despite the grammatical errors, pdc202xx.c's comments perhaps describe it
>>better.
>>* Linux kernel will misunderstand FastTrak ATA-RAID series as Ultra
>>* IDE Controller, UNLESS you enable "CONFIG_PDC202XX_FORCE"
>>* That's you can use FastTrak ATA-RAID controllers as IDE controllers.
>>
>>
>
>It is quite opposite.
>
>
>
>>If this is true, may I suggest something more along the lines of:
>>
>>Ignore FastTrak BIOS and configure controller for RAID
>>CONFIG_PDC202XX_FORCE
>> Forces the driver to use the ATA-RAID capabilities, overriding the
>> BIOS configuration of the controller. Do not enable if you are
>> using Promise's binary module. This option is compatible with the
>> ataraid driver.
>>
>>
>
>What about this:
>
Much better, but
>
>Ignore FastTrak BIOS
>CONFIG_PDC202XX_FORCE
> Forces the driver to use FastTrak controller even if it was disabled
> by BIOS for Promise software RAID driver.
>
This one might confuse people thinking we mean the ataraid driver, and
not the binary only driver.
Maybe:
Forces the driver to use FastTrak controller even if it was disabled
by BIOS for Promise's binary only software RAID driver.
>
> Say Y if you do not use Promise's software RAID or
> if you want to use ataraid driver.
>
>
> Say N if you want to use Promise's binary module.
>
>
>
>>If the Linux driver has the same limitation in regards to using CD-ROM
>>drives on the controller while it's in RAID mode as the Windows drivers
>>do, it may be useful to mention the fact that the option is incompatible
>>with CD-ROM drives attached to the controller.
>>
>>
>
>It has. According to Andre it is doable but big pain,
>also Promise gives docs under NDA which makes it even harder.
>
>Please search lkml archive if you want know technical details.
>
>
>
>>Of course, maybe it means the complete opposite, and I'm reading everything
>>wrong, in which case, there are some comments you may want to fix, too.
>>
>>
>
>Comments in Promise driver need fixing.
>
>
>
--
Once you have their hardware. Never give it back.
(The First Rule of Hardware Acquisition)
Sam Flory <sflory@rackable.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-10 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-10 22:05 IDE/Promise 20276 FastTrack RAID Doesn't work in 2.4.21, patchattached to fix Chad Kitching
2003-07-10 22:18 ` Samuel Flory
2003-07-10 22:29 ` Steven Dake
2003-07-10 22:51 ` Samuel Flory
2003-07-10 23:13 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-07-10 23:57 ` Steven Dake
2003-07-10 23:24 ` Steven Dake
2003-07-10 23:43 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-07-10 23:54 ` Samuel Flory
2003-07-11 0:18 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-07-10 22:55 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-07-10 23:04 ` Samuel Flory [this message]
2003-07-12 15:11 ` Ruth Ivimey-Cook
2003-07-12 16:14 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-07-12 17:01 ` Ruth Ivimey-Cook
2003-07-14 17:31 ` Samuel Flory
2003-07-14 18:49 ` Alan Cox
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-12 18:36 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F0DF118.3080806@rackable.com \
--to=sflory@rackable.com \
--cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=CKitching@powerlandcomputers.com \
--cc=andre@linux-ide.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdake@mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.