From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josef =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6llers?= Subject: Why REPORT LUN only for SCSI-2? Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 16:18:24 +0200 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <3F140D30.D2B5C4D8@fujitsu-siemens.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from plim.fujitsu-siemens.com ([217.115.66.8]:27441 "EHLO plim.fujitsu-siemens.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267773AbTGOOBV convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2003 10:01:21 -0400 Received: from trulli.pdb.fsc.net ([172.25.96.53]) by plim.fujitsu-siemens.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id h6FEGAG11580 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 16:16:10 +0200 Received: from fujitsu-siemens.com (bounty.pdb.fsc.net [172.25.253.16]) by trulli.pdb.fsc.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h6FEG9d22431 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 16:16:09 +0200 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Hi, Ist there a hard reason not to allow the REPORT LUNS command for SCSI-2 devices? Are there actually some SCSI-2 devices which break on this command? There are several devices (e.g. RAID) which tread carefull and claim only SCSI-2 compliancy but support REPORT LUNS. It would make life easier with these if REPORT LUNS would be generally available. Eg I have a box which will happily accept INQUIRYs on LUNs 0-7 but REPORT LUNS returns only the 4 configured LUNs. --=20 Josef M=F6llers (Pinguinpfleger bei FSC) If failure had no penalty success would not be a prize -- T. Pratchett - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html